sancome Posted May 14, 2014 Share #101 Posted May 14, 2014 NanoBoot 5.0 updated to 5.0.2.2 http://translate.google.com/translate?h ... boot.tk%2F Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panja Posted May 14, 2014 Share #102 Posted May 14, 2014 NanoBoot 5.0 updated to 5.0.2.2 http://translate.google.com/translate?h ... boot.tk%2F Awesome mate! Good work. Change log (in English): v5.0.2.2 [X64 & x86] 1) hard disk controller drivers are no longer integrated into the kernel, changed to a module loaded 2) increasing the Fusion MPT, LSI MegaRaid other related controller driver 3) increasing Marvell LAN Driver and other related 4) increase the Realtek r8101 (v1.025) and r8168 (v8.038) network card driver 5) increasing Realtek r8169_new (v6.018) network card driver is no longer integrated old r8169 NIC driver 6) to update Intel igb NIC driver (v5.0.6) version, support I350, I210/211 card, etc. 7) Intel e1000e NIC driver to update (v3.0.4) versions, such as the card supports I217/218 Added the 5.0.2.2 release to a few (non-Chinese) mirrors: Zippyshare Sendspace Solid Files UppIT Mega File Upload Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nindustries Posted May 14, 2014 Share #103 Posted May 14, 2014 Good work! btw) How do I adjust the MACs? serial was just the parameter sn, but the macs.. ? EDIT: Ha, probably mac1=x, mac2=x ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panja Posted May 14, 2014 Share #104 Posted May 14, 2014 Good work! btw) How do I adjust the MACs? serial was just the parameter sn, but the macs.. ? EDIT: Ha, probably mac1=x, mac2=x ? Where did you find that? I would like to know how to change the serial as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trantor Posted May 14, 2014 Share #105 Posted May 14, 2014 I don't want to ruin the party nor Sancome's awesome works but for now the fix to get DSM 5.0-4482 working is just a workaround. Using old files (from 4458) is great (not very clean) but the protection is still here. Synology will make new updates and we can't use old files for ever... We need something to fool the protection so no need to replace any system files. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nindustries Posted May 14, 2014 Share #106 Posted May 14, 2014 Good work! btw) How do I adjust the MACs? serial was just the parameter sn, but the macs.. ? EDIT: Ha, probably mac1=x, mac2=x ? Where did you find that? I would like to know how to change the serial as well. I think I searched the forums. Edit syslinux.cfg, and modify the sn parameter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeuz Posted May 14, 2014 Share #107 Posted May 14, 2014 What means "Trial..."? "Sport", money, etc... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panja Posted May 14, 2014 Share #108 Posted May 14, 2014 (edited) I don't want to ruin the party nor Sancome's awesome works but for now the fix to get DSM 5.0-4482 working is just a workaround. Using old files (from 4458) is great (not very clean) but the protection is still here. Synology will make new updates and we can't use old files for ever... We need something to fool the protection so no need to replace any system files. Thanks for the heads up Trantor. Btw are you planning to release (an ESXi) DSM 5.0 build xxxx? I'm running your ESXi v1.2 release (DSM 4.3 build 3827) rock steady and loving it! Edited May 14, 2014 by Guest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tosh123 Posted May 14, 2014 Share #109 Posted May 14, 2014 I don't want to ruin the party nor Sancome's awesome works but for now the fix to get DSM 5.0-4482 working is just a workaround. Using old files (from 4458) is great (not very clean) but the protection is still here. Synology will make new updates and we can't use old files for ever... We need something to fool the protection so no need to replace any system files. In http://xpenology.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2962&start=170#p17596 f.e. they said that unpatched pattern files are used. On wich stage they are using old 4458 files? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fafner Posted May 14, 2014 Share #110 Posted May 14, 2014 ... they said that unpatched pattern files are used. I'm using original Synology 4482 .pat file with Nanoboot 5.0.2.2 under ESXi 5.5 and it works. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exdee Posted May 14, 2014 Share #111 Posted May 14, 2014 ... they said that unpatched pattern files are used. I'm using original Synology 4482 .pat file with Nanoboot 5.0.2.2 under ESXi 5.5 and it works. Hi. Give me please nano boot VMDK file and little manual how to it use. Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trantor Posted May 14, 2014 Share #112 Posted May 14, 2014 I don't want to ruin the party nor Sancome's awesome works but for now the fix to get DSM 5.0-4482 working is just a workaround. Using old files (from 4458) is great (not very clean) but the protection is still here. Synology will make new updates and we can't use old files for ever... We need something to fool the protection so no need to replace any system files. In http://xpenology.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2962&start=170#p17596 f.e. they said that unpatched pattern files are used. On wich stage they are using old 4458 files? Just read the changelog... (google translate) v5.0.2.1 [x64 & x86] 1, support the installation DSM 5.0-4482, please use the official pat files (thanks to @ Vortex published data) 2, update Ramdisk to 5.0-4482 3, the test is limited, carefully upgrade Sancome thanks Vortex for this post : viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2962&start=130#p17364 So YES your are using the official pat file. But nanoboot like gnoboot replace files (modules, scripts..) during boot process. So unless sancome "break" the protection, he replaces the files mentionned by Vortex with the one from 5.0-4458 build. Please Sancome can you confirm ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
setch Posted May 14, 2014 Share #113 Posted May 14, 2014 Looks like nanoboot copies over the older files during the boot process. I just did a clean install using nanoboot and then checked the /usr/syno/synoman/webman/ folders and all the files copied during the boot have a datetime stamp of today and match the list of files described for the patch, whereas the original Synology one are stamped Apr 23. Setch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newbi Posted May 14, 2014 Share #114 Posted May 14, 2014 Has anyone tried this on a N54L with gnoBoot already installed? Has it kept all the folders I.E. video\Music ect Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sancome Posted May 14, 2014 Share #115 Posted May 14, 2014 You're right, I was just replaces the files during the boot, I can't really break it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
access9 Posted May 14, 2014 Share #116 Posted May 14, 2014 Has anyone tried this on a N54L with gnoBoot already installed?Has it kept all the folders I.E. video\Music ect guide here: http://cyanlabs.co.uk/tutorials/synolog ... o-nanoboot demonstrates how to install on the N54L (using vmware. Shouldn't be any different. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddan83 Posted May 14, 2014 Share #117 Posted May 14, 2014 Has anyone tried this on a N54L with gnoBoot already installed?Has it kept all the folders I.E. video\Music ect just replaced the usb, booted with the 4482 option, installed latest .pat from syno assistant and everything is saved Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oasis475 Posted May 14, 2014 Share #118 Posted May 14, 2014 Does anyone know if LSI 9211 card is supported in Nanoboot 5.0.2.2? Thank you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newbi Posted May 14, 2014 Share #119 Posted May 14, 2014 Has anyone tried this on a N54L with gnoBoot already installed?Has it kept all the folders I.E. video\Music ect just replaced the usb, booted with the 4482 option, installed latest .pat from syno assistant and everything is saved Just thought. I can't see what the N54L is doing as I've got no VGA anything. I normally have two usb sticks. One which I boot off(default boot changed in config) and then the other as normal. Like this to install you may edit the menu.lst like this: default 1 timeout 0 fallback 0 On reboot during installation you may change this back to default 0 timeout 0 fallback 0 I must get a small vga lcd soon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
synolo Posted May 14, 2014 Share #120 Posted May 14, 2014 what is difference between " NanoBoot-5.0.2.2-fat.img " and " NanoBoot-5.0.2.2-ext2.img" thx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phoenix73 Posted May 14, 2014 Share #121 Posted May 14, 2014 Very good works Sancome. Highly appreciated Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moogs Posted May 14, 2014 Share #122 Posted May 14, 2014 Does anyone know if LSI 9211 card is supported in Nanoboot 5.0.2.2? Thank you The release notes claim to have the mpt2sas driver/module loaded so I am going to try it tonight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GatekeeperZA Posted May 14, 2014 Share #123 Posted May 14, 2014 Are there any performance improvements with using the x64 nanoboot or not really is it more hardware compatibility..? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XPEH Posted May 14, 2014 Share #124 Posted May 14, 2014 Has anyone tried this on a N54L with gnoBoot already installed?Has it kept all the folders I.E. video\Music ect I have. Everything remained and no configuration was lost. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fma965 Posted May 14, 2014 Share #125 Posted May 14, 2014 Are there any performance improvements with using the x64 nanoboot or not really is it more hardware compatibility..? gnoboot and trantor have always been x64, nanoboot x64 wud be the best to use, x86 was added to support older/slower hardware Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.