merve04

Well data scrub completed, no errors found but didnt fix the problem 😪

Search around in regards to something about needing to remove xpenoboot folder. That’s a key problem when you built a system on the 5.x platform and move up to 6.x and above.

I'm running data scrub on storage pool 1, could it possibly fix the error or am i wasting my time?

Being that a 8TB drive costs $200, even if i wanted to be cheap\risky\crazy and degrade my volume to use couple of the redundant drives as means of storage, id be set back $600. I've been looking at cloud options, g suite as an example. I'm also thinking of trying and removing all docker packages and docker app itself and see if that may be the root cause of this error as it did occur while manipulating things in there.

I’ve done a bit of searching on fsck, I guess there are more complex options for scanning the volume?!? Not too sure if that’s a route I should take. My biggest concern is if I indeed need to recreate the volume, how does one approach offloading nearly 40TB?!?

Indeed there’s a question, twice I’ve tried reboot now and run, both times come back to dsm stating there’s an error. Is there anything else i can do?

I'm not sure if this is where I need to post this but here we go, Yesterday i was tinkering around in docker downloading images, removing old images, doing some backups etc all very simultaneously. Then a box popped up mentioning errors occurred in the file systems.... I've tried doing a simple reboot of the machine but issues still there, and i tried doing the "reboot now" and run a check, maybe 30min went by, maybe less, just recall seeing "checking quota" and then i was able to log in dsm again. Heres some screenshots.

- Outcome of the update: SUCCESSFUL - DSM version prior update: DSM 6.2.2 Update 6 - Loader version and model: Jun's Loader v1.04b 918+ - Using custom extra.lzma: No - Installation type: BAREMETAL - Gigabyte B365M-DS3H, i5 8400, Realtek NIC - Additional comment : System rebooted twice, updated from GUI.

Good to know and thanks for the reply, currently expanding volume so will give it a shot once completed.

Are you running baremetal? Im still on 6.2.2u6 and wouldnt mind jumping to 6.2.3 but fear this hdd limit thing as I too currently have 13 hdd's and running 918+ on a gigabyte b365m-ds3h w/ lsi-9211-8i. Did you need to configure anything special to get all hdd's

May have found the issue, noticed the UniFi container in my docker was sitting at a whopping 2.5GB Ram usage. I set a limit to 512MB. Will take 8-10 days to see if it is indeed the issue and wether it won’t mess it up.

Just rebooted, same screenshots

I'm just lost for words...

It seems like its still an ongoing problem, ive tried stopping apps like plex, VMM, and memory usage stays high, yes I could reboot and problem will be fixed but something is causing it and not sure where to start looking.. System is running 6.2.2 U4 and has 16GB ram installed.

As the title mentions, can I use SAS drives? considering I already have a mix of sata drives in operation, mostly running off a lsi-9211-8i it mode.

I get what is being laid down here, but I've already got a 16x hdd hotswap rackmount case, but theres a ridiculous amount of room inside, i've seen some where people just populate a row of hdds on the inside standing up in the case. But this is where im trying to figure out how to I add more hdd's with my existing lsi card.

This is what I would get? I guess take a 8087 to 8088 cable to feed the 9211-8i to this card and then i have 8 more 8087 ports?? Why the need for PCI-e again? I only have 1 16x pci-e slot which is used by the lsi card.

Are you able to share an example? I've read the site, i've google "SAS expander" but that just lead to different type of sas cards. My question was how does one use a 9211-8i card which only has 2 8087 ports and be able to accommodate 24 or more hard drives?

I know this is a old post, but how it the world do you get 24 hdd's on one 9211-8i card?!?!?! I have one of these cards and i was under the impression 8 was the max?

or another option thats in my mind, I run a second instance of DSM in a VMM at the moment for addtional security cameras, I'd use it, but I've never come to figure out how it could access my volume 1 folders as my VMM is installed a volume 2 of dsm.

The downfall of using torrent clients is the lost ability of using download stations app for remote access.

I agree with protecting torrents, which i use download station for that, but with sab i can establish a ssl connection for usenet downloads, so its irrelevant having a vpn on to just be killing my download speed.

I dont know if this is possible, I've recently got into using usenet, so im using a combination of sonarr\sabnzbd. Is there a way to exclude sabnzbd from connecting behind my VPN?

je catch pas comment t'as pas en besoin d'un pour installer un DSM VM

I read the post in the forum you sent, seems as though you were running plex via docker, i run it natively on syno. I did go a head and uninstall plex, reboot and reinstall lastest plex, system has been on for several hours and seems to be stable at 31% ram usage. Fingers crossed it was only that.