filippo333
-
Posts
156 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Everything posted by filippo333
-
Looks like a fair amount of assembly is involved in modifying/analysing synobios though most of the compilation is bash.
-
Is DSM complaining about wanting to also repair the operating system? Have you tried having a look with filestation? I know for a fact if DSM crashes it can take down most other services until the OS and RAID show up green as a failsafe. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk -
I'd also be very interested in this, I have quite a lot of Linux knowledge and also am a C# coder, I've never built a kernel from source though. A step by step guide would be much appreciated
-
My build is in my signature along with the loader I'm using. Everything works perfectly, including WoL, auto-power-off & auto-shutdown I'm using the DS3615xs image.
-
Looks like Synology don't officially support Quick Sync anyway.
-
That's correct SHR normally continues working when migrated to a loader which doesn't officially support it OOTB Obviously I do strongly recommend editing the config file on the DS3615xs loader if you want to continue using SHR.
-
I believe SHR is only enabled on consumer units by default (like the DS916p). As you said you can enable SHR on enterprise class devices but it's something which has to be done via SSH. Also others have had success with migrating their existing SHR array to a loader with SHR disabled, it just means you cannot create any more SHR arrays without editing your config first. The worst that will happen is DSM will just not mount your volume, though SHR is only disabled via the GUI not system-level. I tested this myself in VMware a while ago and it worked for me (but I went from 6.0.2 to 6.1.1).
-
Please search the forum, loader 1.02b is currently not compatible with AMD since it's a beta release. The stable releases should be compatibile with AMD, if you need AMD support right now then stick with Jun's 1.01 loader.
-
Look around the forum, it's the same process as changing your loader when upgrading from 6.0.2 to 6.1.x.
-
Correct me if I'm wrong: only the DS916p image contains the necessary modules for hardware trans-coding. I believe the enterprise models (DS3615xs, DS3617xs) do not support transcoding via Synology's media apps. You can always use Plex of course like me
-
Bare in mind that this is just for linuxserver/plex, other containers have different requirements. Essentially just mount the two required folders when setting up the container. The docker mount points should look like this: Folder Mount Path /MyMediaFolder /data /MyPlexConfig /config One other thing you may need to do is set your GroupID and UserID to the be same as your Synology user with access to your media. You can do this by typing "cat /etc/passwd" via SSH-ing into your Xpenology box. For example, if your UserID is 1024 and your GroupID is 100; you'd set the PGID and PUID as Docker environment variables shown in the linuxserver/plex documentation accordingly: PUID= 1024 PGID= 100 As for Bridge mode vs Host mode, the default works fine. There is normally not a good reason to change it unless you need a different IP address than your Xpenology system.
-
Plex requires two key components to work, the first is your media (videos, music, pictures etc). The second is a location for Plex to store its settings such the metadata and database. With Docker, you must mount data you want access to as by default everything inside the docker environment is volatile. This means whenever you re-create or update the container, all data within is lost forever. Therefore data you want to keep safe must be mounted; after all you don't want all you media and Plex settings lost every time you decide to update the container.
-
Pretty sure it doesn't work for the same reason QuickConnect won't work. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
-
Is WoL still broken on 1.02b?
-
I wonder what the root cause of this Timb Bomb issue is? It seems migrating your data & applications to a new boot loader is the trigger. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
-
Any way to disable DSM updates completely?
filippo333 replied to filippo333's question in Answered Questions
Nice work regardless for finding that out -
The best things aren't free I'm afraid, even Emby is a paid for product. Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
-
You could probably use Linux's inbuilt dd tool to image a partition/entire disk. Don't ask me for the technical details though, there are likely tons of tutorials if you Google for it
-
Any way to disable DSM updates completely?
filippo333 replied to filippo333's question in Answered Questions
So I want to be able to stop DSM from even attempting to look for updates, just to get rid of the annoying update badge. So far blocking the host file works assuming DSM has never connected to the internet; I'm now thinking it caches whatever the latest version is. -
Any way to disable DSM updates completely?
filippo333 replied to filippo333's question in Answered Questions
Update: So I managed to successfully block DSM updates by editing the following hosts file /etc/hosts (editing /etc.defaults/hosts doesn't work!) I added the following line: The problem is the update badge remains, meaning it's still somehow talking to Synology's servers but at least it won't allow you to update via the GUI.
-
Hello, I was wondering if someone knows how to fully block DSM updates? Seeing that red update badge constantly is triggering me like crazy, should be a simple as blocking the update server from the hosts file I guess? Plus this way I'm forced to apply updates manually Fil.
-
I mean AMD support would be nice but people have to remember; Synology DSM doesn't natively run on AMD hardware (I'm not aware of any current gen Synology hardware running on AMD chips). So further patience will be needed to implement the necessary kernel modules for AMD compatibility
-
Agreed, I use No-IP and that works a treat! I don't know much about Surveillance station, but I guess that's okay if you need to buy licenses for it. Also I had a real Synology for a day or too (DS1515+) and it was just way too underpowered to do my Plex 1080p video transcoding; so I have no choice other than to stick with my i3 6100 system personally. Don't feel like shelling out close to £2500 for a NAS
-
If this becomes a trend and Synology start locking out all their first party applications... Xpenology becomes much less compelling to many people (including myself) Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
-
Just ordered this one for my build thanks to your suggestion <(^.^)> However in the UK it cost me £197 inc tax.... It's crazy how difficult it is to find decent ITX sized NAS cases!
