Leaderboard

yes, the recent extra.lzma's have the aqc111.ko driver for the Aquantia AQtion AQC111U after using the extra.lzma and plug in the hardware you could check with lsusb if its detected (bearcats link shows some of that)

as far as i'm aware for usb 3.0/3.1 and 2.5G/5GBase-T its always Aquantia AQtion AQC111U and if its "only" up to 2.5GBase-T then its Realtek RTL8156 we have drivers for both adapters in the additional extra.lzma already edit: btw, you really expect anyone to just identify a product by the picture? you should write the name of the product to have at least a few people giving you an decent answer (my guess its qnap)

Если подключить диск к работающей системе как внутренний, то он будет отформатирован и все с него пропадет. Попробуйте сначала подключить его через USB как внешний. Форматирования не будет и ext4 раздел будет виден через usbshare(xxx). Можно будет перенести данные на внутренние разделы. Потом, можно этот диск ставить вовнутрь, форматировать и добавлять к существующим. Если места внутри поднятого сервера не хватает или старые диски организованы в массив RAID5, то делайте бэкап, ставите диски в систему и востанавливайте. Если RAID1, то любой из зеркальных дисков содержит всю информацию и подключение через USB может помочь. В таком случае после проверки, что оба видны по очереди, можно ставить один вовнутрь, форматировать и переносить через USB со второго. Потом второй добавить вовнутрь. Хорошо что сначала спросили. Опасения потерять данные не напрасны.

Update 2 installed. No problem.

Thanks for the response. In case someone searches and stumbles across this post: The issue was the router, possibly the ISP. Could not get it work whatever configuration I tried. Solved it by installing remote.it on a raspberry pi and used it as a VPN. Maybe not ideal but now it works at least! Good luck!

Have a look at this, it might give you some pointers.

IF the drives in this box originally came from the old 5.2 box then you need to do this before any further investigation:

Great, that helps. You would be surprised about the number of people that come along planning to use XPEnology and haven't even used DSM. Still true, or they have an Infiniband mode that can be selected. Thus my comment about the drivers. I know the Synology linux driver has support for the Infiniband features on my Mellanox card, but really couldn't tell you how well it worked as my home lab has no need for it. I use the term secondary cache for SSD because all the available RAM in DSM is used for cache. If I can feed a storage system 100% bandwidth feed and the disks keep up indefinitely, what should I care about cache or interface type? And SSD cache (particularly the r/w style) creates a concentrated data loss vector. Risk for little or no reward IMHO. I'm not saying don't use SAS (there are controllers that work). But you have a cost limitation, drives are the majority of your cost, and SAS may not offer any more performance depending on layout. You never really said how much total storage was needed but the drive layout obviously factors (even with SSD it's bandwidth multipliers vs sustained write ability instead of spindles). Depending on your targets, the value proposition for drives like 883DCT/Micron 5300/Seagate Nytro/Intel S4510 could be compelling. For example, eight of the above SSD's can handle one 40Gbe IB connection. With RAIDF1 that's 26TB usable (using 3.84Tb drives).