Mary Andrea Posted September 27, 2020 Share #501 Posted September 27, 2020 Thk so much IG-88 I'm in 3617xs with DSM 6.2.3-25426 Update2, (so , definitely doesn't a grub configuration problem, really? but I stayed thinking about speed transferences ... I didn't know the slow performance about this card... yes , I could try to change back it.. I keep thinking about ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arkilee Posted September 28, 2020 Share #502 Posted September 28, 2020 Hello, I changed the extra.lzma for loader 1.03b ds3615 from extra3615_v0.11_test.zip to automaticaly load virtio drivers. Virtio_net network seems to works pretty well on Proxmox and dsm 6.2.3 thanks to IG-88 driver extension v0.11_test, where networks speed can reach 13Gbps without any noticeable issue for now. I would like to compile (and test) some more drivers for dsm 6.2.3 on loader 1.03b ds3615, but i cannot find linux kernel source for bromolow dsm 6.2.3 25426 and its chain tools. Where could I find this kernel source ? If not available, Which available older kernel source can I use to compile driver which may work for dsm 6.2.3 ? Thanks for your time to reply. Cheers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IG-88 Posted September 28, 2020 Author Share #503 Posted September 28, 2020 1 hour ago, arkilee said: Hello, I changed the extra.lzma for loader 1.03b ds3615 from extra3615_v0.11_test.zip to automaticaly load virtio drivers. Virtio_net network seems to works pretty well on Proxmox and dsm 6.2.3 thanks to IG-88 driver extension v0.11_test, where networks speed can reach 13Gbps without any noticeable issue for now. i was intending to make a special version for virtio but never found time to do so (when not being able to test it myself its usually pretty time consuming so i did not start it) did you remove some other stuff or did you just added the virtio modules? did you test that version on baremetal too (i guess not) anything that did not load properly, like modules throws errors or crashed? 1 hour ago, arkilee said: I would like to compile (and test) some more drivers for dsm 6.2.3 on loader 1.03b ds3615, but i cannot find linux kernel source for bromolow dsm 6.2.3 25426 and its chain tools. what drivers? sadly synology did not release anything and we usually have to use older kernel code, until march we used over 2 year old beta kernel code and since then 6.2.2 kernel code, i guess better then over two year old code 1 hour ago, arkilee said: Where could I find this kernel source ? If not available, Which available older kernel source can I use to compile driver which may work for dsm 6.2.3 ? https://sourceforge.net/projects/dsgpl/files/ i use 6.2.2 kernel source and toolchain depending of what you want to do there might be some strings attached, lots of storage drivers are not working because of code changes and as long as synology does not need these drives you would need to fix that yourself, also there are issues with 918+ and scsi/sas (see 1st post) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arkilee Posted September 28, 2020 Share #504 Posted September 28, 2020 4 hours ago, IG-88 said: did you remove some other stuff or did you just added the virtio modules? No, I didn't add or removed any drivers. I just used your extra.lzma v0.11 which already have virtio ko drivers compiled. Then edit etc/rc.modules to add under EXTRA_MODULES: virtio virtio_ring virtio_mmio virtio_pci virtio_blk virtio_scsi virtio_net virtio_balloon 4 hours ago, IG-88 said: did you test that version on baremetal too (i guess not) No, only in proxmox kvm vm. 4 hours ago, IG-88 said: anything that did not load properly, like modules throws errors or crashed? So far, I only see virtio_balloon which is not loading with the following error: "virtio_balloon: Unknown symbol balloon_mapping_alloc (err 0)" Others virtio stuff seems to be ok: - virtio_net reach 13Gbps with iperf3 between host and vm - Virtio_blk disk seems to work as well but it's not recognised by DSM, so I didn't test much - Same for virtio_scsi, which is not recognised by dsm 4 hours ago, IG-88 said: i use 6.2.2 kernel source and toolchain I read that extra drivers, you have compiled for dsm 6.2.2, seems not to work for 6.2.3 ... or maybe I didnt understant what u mean. Well I may try with 6.2.2 then when I have time ... it was to fix virtio ballooning (but it's not a very important) and maybe add 9p net drivers. For now, I am quite happy to get virtio network working on dsm 6.2.3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IG-88 Posted September 28, 2020 Author Share #505 Posted September 28, 2020 2 minutes ago, arkilee said: - Virtio_blk disk seems to work as well but it's not recognised by DSM, so I didn't test much - Same for virtio_scsi, which is not recognised by dsm i thought that would be virtual controller of kvm like the para virtual scsi of vmware, kind of "native" virtual driver for better performance 11 minutes ago, arkilee said: maybe add 9p net drivers. i did add some 9p modules, maybe i forgot one (the stuff is scattered through the config when using "menuconfig") i just checked and the 9p, 9pnet, 9pnet_virtio are in the 3615 and 918+ for testing, not in the 3617, i will add that to my list 4 minutes ago, arkilee said: I read that extra drivers, you have compiled for dsm 6.2.2, seems not to work for 6.2.3 ... or maybe I didnt understant what u mean. the modules all use the same vermagic, as the kernel from synology dictates (we have to use that binary kernel) so its 4.4.59+ for 918+ and all modules i compile be it from old beta kernel source or from 6.2.2 source synology stay with that kernel inside a dsm line like 6.2, and then fixes and tinkers with revisions (thats the number behind that dsm 6.2.x) if there are "bigger" changes the will release an new kernel and thats a full dsm file (~200-300MB) like 6.2.1, 6.2.2, 6.2.3 it sure is a risk to compile drivers for a kernel you dont have source for but depending of the changes synology is doing it usually work's, its the bast we can do without the source and making a driver from vanilla kernel.org source would be the last resort Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevingu Posted September 29, 2020 Share #506 Posted September 29, 2020 @IG-88 Is the driver externsion suitable for dsm 6.2.1? I have a running dsm(6.2.1) on asrock J3455-itx, can I just enable the hardware transcoding by the following steps? 1. re place extra.lzma、extra2.lzma files in the loader udisk. 2. remove all the files from update and firmware directories. 3. reboot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arkilee Posted September 29, 2020 Share #507 Posted September 29, 2020 10 hours ago, IG-88 said: i thought that would be virtual controller of kvm like the para virtual scsi of vmware, kind of "native" virtual driver for better performance Yes, it's to get virtual drive with better io performance than emulated sata/pci drive. Here, I can see virtual drive with fdisk (here 16GiB=Virtio_blk and 32GiB=VirtioScsi) but I cannot see theses drives from dsm gui : $ sudo fdisk -l | grep "^Disk /dev" Disk /dev/sdg: 50 MiB, 52428800 bytes, 102400 sectors Disk /dev/sdh: 6 GiB, 6442450944 bytes, 12582912 sectors Disk /dev/md0: 2.4 GiB, 2549940224 bytes, 4980352 sectors Disk /dev/md1: 2 GiB, 2147418112 bytes, 4194176 sectors Disk /dev/zram0: 148 MiB, 155189248 bytes, 37888 sectors Disk /dev/zram1: 148 MiB, 155189248 bytes, 37888 sectors Disk /dev/vda: 16 GiB, 17179869184 bytes, 33554432 sectors Disk /dev/sdm: 32 GiB, 34359738368 bytes, 67108864 sectors And here virtio network speed with iperf between host and vm: $ iperf3 -c 192.168.0.1 -i 2 Connecting to host 192.168.0.1, port 5201 [ 5] local 192.168.0.25 port 49499 connected to 192.168.0.1 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd [ 5] 0.00-2.00 sec 2.74 GBytes 11.8 Gbits/sec 0 3.06 MBytes [ 5] 2.00-4.00 sec 3.07 GBytes 13.2 Gbits/sec 0 3.06 MBytes [ 5] 4.00-6.00 sec 3.07 GBytes 13.2 Gbits/sec 0 3.06 MBytes [ 5] 6.00-8.00 sec 2.97 GBytes 12.7 Gbits/sec 0 3.06 MBytes [ 5] 8.00-10.00 sec 2.95 GBytes 12.7 Gbits/sec 0 3.06 MBytes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 14.8 GBytes 12.7 Gbits/sec 0 sender [ 5] 0.00-10.04 sec 14.8 GBytes 12.7 Gbits/sec receiver iperf Done. Great news for 9p driver ... I may try to compile some stuff with 6.2.2 kernel/chaintools aswell and check if it work on 6.2.3. Thanks for your work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arkilee Posted September 29, 2020 Share #508 Posted September 29, 2020 47 minutes ago, arkilee said: I can see virtual drive with fdisk (here 16GiB=Virtio_blk and 32GiB=VirtioScsi) Update: - virtio_scsi drive appear in dsm as external esata drive, which cannot be used in dsm storage pool but only as external drive. It seems to work fine as external drive. - virtio_blk drive does appear anywhere in dsm, but it can be seen in linux cmd line and create filesystem on it. As a linux filesystem, it seems to works fine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IG-88 Posted September 29, 2020 Author Share #509 Posted September 29, 2020 32 minutes ago, arkilee said: - virtio_scsi drive appear in dsm as external esata drive, which cannot be used in dsm storage pool but only as external drive. It seems to work fine as external drive. whats the number of regular disks you have in your vm? with the 12 drive default fully used a 13th disk will be seen as esata its also possible to have external drives used as internal by meddling with the config in a way thats officially not the case you would extend the max drives to 24 and make all the internal config covering all that (ffffff), ignoring the fact that external and usb are already might take that places, the "internal" will win and you should see that drive as internal you might be able to have a performance comparison between the emulated and the "new" virtual drive (each configured as one volume with one drive as basic raid type) same would then be possible if mounting the blk device as /volume2 i guess, it is possible to use it as volume as the old way of making a nvme ssd usable was to have it as virtual drive in a esxi vm and then mount it manually as data volume, not the best way but at least it would also be possible to get some performance values to see if its with any effort compared with the virt. scsi drive Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IG-88 Posted September 29, 2020 Author Share #510 Posted September 29, 2020 8 hours ago, kevingu said: Is the driver externsion suitable for dsm 6.2.1? I have a running dsm(6.2.1) on asrock J3455-itx, can I just enable the hardware transcoding by the following steps? afair the change braking the drivers was introduced in DSM 6.2.1-23824 so if you use the latest 6.2.1 it will be the same as 6.2.2 but the i915 driver in both are the same, we did not have the source jun used for this driver so it was reused in 6.2.2 and worked so if hardware trancoding is your problem then it might be something diffrent, the best way in that case is 6.2.3, just follow the guide in that thread the new i915 driver from synology works at least as good as jun's, does seem to have less problems with some different apollolake and geminilake boards 8 hours ago, kevingu said: 1. re place extra.lzma、extra2.lzma files in the loader udisk. 2. remove all the files from update and firmware directories. 3. reboot i would not clean out the firmware directory as there are firmwares from synology there that does not come with the loader, i file more there does not hurt and the loader will compare and replace firmware files by itself, so any old/different files will be replaced and new file will be copied cleaning the update folder does not hurt but is not needed usually (if so it will be written in the guide i wrote to that extra.lzma in question) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arkilee Posted September 29, 2020 Share #511 Posted September 29, 2020 1 hour ago, IG-88 said: whats the number of regular disks you have in your vm? Only 4 virtual disks: - Sata0 : bootloader : 50MB - Sata1 : Dsm OS : 6GB - Virtio2 : Disk : 16GB - Scsci3 : Disk : 32GB (on virtio_scsi) 1 hour ago, IG-88 said: you might be able to have a performance comparison between the emulated and the "new" virtual drive Just did some dd speed test between disks, and I cannot see any significant speed improvement actually. LoL (Read: 545 MB/s , Write: 63.5 MB/s) So better using virtual sata disk which is recognised by dsm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IG-88 Posted September 29, 2020 Author Share #512 Posted September 29, 2020 1 minute ago, arkilee said: Just did some dd speed test between disks, and I cannot see any significant speed improvement actually. LoL (Read: 545 MB/s , Write: 63.5 MB/s) So better using virtual sata disk which is recognised by dsm what controller(s) are emulated? that defines the driver that must be present for this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arkilee Posted September 29, 2020 Share #513 Posted September 29, 2020 3 hours ago, IG-88 said: what controller(s) are emulated? that defines the driver that must be present for this I dont know, you cannot choose PCI controller in Proxmox but you can choose SCSI controller. Well it doesn't really matter now as disk performance is almost the same in virtio or not. Or maybe my ssd disk, where virtual drives are stored, is not fast enough to make appearing any perf difference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ezra Posted October 1, 2020 Share #514 Posted October 1, 2020 On 8/26/2020 at 12:00 PM, ztielong said: Hi, It seems that I have met the same problem with post id:396 I bought TP-LINK NG421 2.5G nic with chip RTL8125B. After updated the extra v0.11_test(http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=04147311964729253115), PCIE Lan3 successfully recognized in the control panel. but dhcp failed. the ip is still 169.254.182.x, Changed to a static ip but problem still. newly install DSM 6.2.3 25426U2 with loader 1.03b for DS3615xs Mainboard:SuperMicro x10slv-q with 2 nic I217-V and I210-AT onboard PCIE: TP-LINK NG421 2.5G(RTL8125B) CPU: G3460T please help, thanks. I also bought TP-LINK NG421 2.5G(RTL8125B) and encountered the same problem as you but I'm using v1.03b DS3617XS. Dose anyone has newer extra.lzma that works? Thanks for your helps - DSM version prior update: DSM 6.2.3-25426 - Loader version and model: Jun's Loader v1.03b DS3617XS - Using custom extra.lzma: extra3617_v0.11_test Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warlock928 Posted October 1, 2020 Share #515 Posted October 1, 2020 ok so i have an x9scl board running 3617 dsm 6.2.3 25426. i am trying to use a Supermicro AOC-SASLP-MV8 hba card....i had everything working except the card would only see 4 drives...so i modified the synoinfo file using root to have 45 drives....then the unit stopped booting and now gives me the option to migrate or install...neither of which work...any ideas here? i have another unit that is stable with a 24 drive setting but can only use 10 drives due to the fact that the 8 port card wont work in that one either...its running as a 3615 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
merve04 Posted October 2, 2020 Share #516 Posted October 2, 2020 I think there's a major difference between the drivers used for a lsi 9211 found in the original jun 1.04b loader and adding extra v0.12 Heres my findings; I made a new usb with the extra\extra2 v0.12 applied to load 1.04b, booted and installed dsm 6.2.3u2, when trying to transfer files, it was super slow, 30-50MBps I reflashed the same usb key and installed 1.04b untouched, loading dsm 6.2.2u6, transfer speeds 70-100MBps. What could be the issue? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Primo Posted October 4, 2020 Share #517 Posted October 4, 2020 On 9/29/2020 at 7:25 PM, IG-88 said: what controller(s) are emulated? that defines the driver that must be present for this Can you upload this file in another host?. Thanks same as above but for the new driver in 6.2.3 Update2 http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=60054869936813513844 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IG-88 Posted October 4, 2020 Author Share #518 Posted October 4, 2020 4 hours ago, Primo said: but for the new driver in 6.2.3 Update2 ??? whats different in u2 compared with the initial 6.2.3 that would need anything newly done? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ezra Posted October 5, 2020 Share #519 Posted October 5, 2020 (edited) On 7/14/2020 at 10:02 PM, Stan_G said: hi i`v bought rtl8125.also i·v updated the extra.and i found the "lan" in the control panel.but i cant get a dhcp.the ip is still 169.254.58.x the network port light flashes.and i also set a static ip,but still can`t find the nas.why On 7/16/2020 at 4:57 AM, IG-88 said: what loader and dsm type, what mainbaord and any additional hardware like other nic's? On 7/16/2020 at 9:52 PM, Stan_G said: my loader is 1.03b 3615xs DSM6.23 .thanks for ur new extra.and i`v updated the extra.it works well On 8/26/2020 at 12:00 PM, ztielong said: Hi, It seems that I have met the same problem with post id:396 I bought TP-LINK NG421 2.5G nic with chip RTL8125B. After updated the extra v0.11_test(http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=04147311964729253115), PCIE Lan3 successfully recognized in the control panel. but dhcp failed. the ip is still 169.254.182.x, Changed to a static ip but problem still. newly install DSM 6.2.3 25426U2 with loader 1.03b for DS3615xs Mainboard:SuperMicro x10slv-q with 2 nic I217-V and I210-AT onboard PCIE: TP-LINK NG421 2.5G(RTL8125B) CPU: G3460T please help, thanks. On 9/4/2020 at 2:13 PM, bzfzis said: I encountered the same problem as you. The RLT8125B chip can be used normally under DSM 918+, but DHCP fails under DSM3615x. It's a pity that I need to use LSI SAS to link SAS hard drives, and DSM 918+ system is not suitable for me. On 9/4/2020 at 5:50 PM, ztielong said: I received a new extra from Stan_G, if you need, please leave your email address, I'll forward to you. @IG-88 Seems you have fixed this problem for 3615xs. Could you do the same modify to extra for 3617xs? Thank you very much. Edited October 5, 2020 by Ezra Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IG-88 Posted October 5, 2020 Author Share #520 Posted October 5, 2020 14 hours ago, Ezra said: Seems you have fixed this problem for 3615xs. Could you do the same modify to extra for 3617xs? Thank you very much. your comment about u2 was a little misleading what you want is newer driver for realtek 8125, not anything (old) newly compiled for 6.2.3 u2 the next version will have recent drivers for realtek and intel nic's so the driver in question should be the same then for all three extra's Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diglam Posted October 5, 2020 Share #521 Posted October 5, 2020 On 9/26/2020 at 12:04 AM, diglam said: I have similar problem with Realtek 8168 on TerraMaster F2-421. I installed by using extra.lzma/extra2.lzma for loader 1.04b ds918+ DSM 6.2.3 v0.13.3 and everything seems ok except network speed. Speed is unstable and slow: admin@NasBoss:/$ iperf3 -c 10.10.2.51 Connecting to host 10.10.2.51, port 5201 [ 5] local 10.10.2.11 port 35010 connected to 10.10.2.51 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd [ 5] 0.00-1.08 sec 29.0 MBytes 226 Mbits/sec 0 214 KBytes [ 5] 1.08-2.00 sec 10.0 MBytes 90.8 Mbits/sec 0 214 KBytes [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 9.36 MBytes 78.5 Mbits/sec 0 214 KBytes [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 34.6 MBytes 290 Mbits/sec 0 214 KBytes [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 91.9 MBytes 771 Mbits/sec 0 214 KBytes [ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 11.1 MBytes 92.9 Mbits/sec 0 151 KBytes [ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 8.75 MBytes 73.4 Mbits/sec 0 212 KBytes [ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 14.9 MBytes 125 Mbits/sec 0 212 KBytes [ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 63.1 MBytes 530 Mbits/sec 0 111 KBytes [ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 79.0 MBytes 663 Mbits/sec 0 211 KBytes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 352 MBytes 295 Mbits/sec 0 sender [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 351 MBytes 294 Mbits/sec receiver iperf Done. admin@NasBoss:/$ iperf3 -s ----------------------------------------------------------- Server listening on 5201 ----------------------------------------------------------- Accepted connection from 10.10.2.51, port 58149 [ 5] local 10.10.2.11 port 5201 connected to 10.10.2.51 port 58150 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 16.2 MBytes 136 Mbits/sec [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 6.62 MBytes 55.6 Mbits/sec [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 3.55 MBytes 29.8 Mbits/sec [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 2.53 MBytes 21.2 Mbits/sec [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 34.3 MBytes 288 Mbits/sec [ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 10.9 MBytes 91.2 Mbits/sec [ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 3.98 MBytes 33.4 Mbits/sec [ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 32.0 MBytes 269 Mbits/sec [ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 2.59 MBytes 21.7 Mbits/sec [ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 75.6 MBytes 634 Mbits/sec [ 5] 10.00-10.14 sec 8.72 MBytes 539 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate [ 5] 0.00-10.14 sec 197 MBytes 163 Mbits/sec receiver Did I use wrong drive extension? Terramaster F2-421 has 4 lan port 2xRealtek 8111F (uses r8168 driver) and 2xRealtek 8152 (uses r8153 driver). I enabled other 2 Realtek 8152 (r8153) lan ports and tested them, they behaves same like r8168. During playing settings I noticed something strange; if I change MTU (value doesn't matter) value of LAN port on Control Panel of DSM, iperf3 reports full gigabit speed (around 949 Mbits/sec) of lan port initially. But after DSM restarts somethings (maybe some services???) again reports slow and unstable speeds. ----------------------------------------------------------- Server listening on 5201 ----------------------------------------------------------- Accepted connection from 10.10.2.51, port 59879 [ 5] local 10.10.2.12 port 5201 connected to 10.10.2.51 port 59885 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 108 MBytes 905 Mbits/sec [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 113 MBytes 949 Mbits/sec [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 113 MBytes 949 Mbits/sec [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 113 MBytes 949 Mbits/sec [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 111 MBytes 933 Mbits/sec [ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 63.0 MBytes 528 Mbits/sec [ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 10.6 MBytes 89.2 Mbits/sec [ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 23.0 MBytes 193 Mbits/sec [ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 2.23 MBytes 18.7 Mbits/sec [ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 8.79 MBytes 73.8 Mbits/sec [ 5] 10.00-10.20 sec 156 KBytes 6.39 Mbits/sec - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate [ 5] 0.00-10.20 sec 666 MBytes 548 Mbits/sec receiver ----------------------------------------------------------- Server listening on 5201 ----------------------------------------------------------- I booted F2-421 with Terramaster's official TOS and Manjaro live USB, then repeated iperf3 tests. All 4 ports of device were OK and gives full gigabit speed. So there is no hardware problem. I really need help, please. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IG-88 Posted October 5, 2020 Author Share #522 Posted October 5, 2020 27 minutes ago, diglam said: Terramaster F2-421 has 4 lan port 2xRealtek 8111F (uses r8168 driver) and 2xRealtek 8152 (uses r8153 driver). I enabled other 2 Realtek 8152 (r8153) lan ports and tested them, they behaves same like r8168. During playing settings I noticed something strange; if I change MTU (value doesn't matter) value of LAN port on Control Panel of DSM, iperf3 reports full gigabit speed (around 949 Mbits/sec) of lan port initially. But after DSM restarts somethings (maybe some services???) again reports slow and unstable speeds. did you try to use 3615 instead of 918+? i've read complains lately that 918+ over all delvers less performace then 3615/17 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diglam Posted October 5, 2020 Share #523 Posted October 5, 2020 7 minutes ago, IG-88 said: did you try to use 3615 instead of 918+? i've read complains lately that 918+ over all delvers less performace then 3615/17 No, will try now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ezra Posted October 6, 2020 Share #524 Posted October 6, 2020 12 hours ago, IG-88 said: your comment about u2 was a little misleading what you want is newer driver for realtek 8125, not anything (old) newly compiled for 6.2.3 u2 the next version will have recent drivers for realtek and intel nic's so the driver in question should be the same then for all three extra's Thank you for your efforts. I will wait for next version. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike861033 Posted October 6, 2020 Share #525 Posted October 6, 2020 None of the links is live. The all are dead (tinyupload dead, gofile is just looping showing shortlink to download). Please reupload, many people asked for that many times in last weeks, is there anyone else that has a copy of those files and can upload these? We all are waiting now couple weeks and OP is AFK. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.