IG-88 Posted June 21, 2020 Author Share #351 Posted June 21, 2020 1 hour ago, yuyuko said: SasIdxMap=0 DiskIdxMap=0005 SataPortMap=56 SasIdxMap=0 DiskIdxMap=0500 SataPortMap=65 SasIdxMap=0 DiskIdxMap=05 SataPortMap=65 sorry but this thread is about drivers for 6.2.3, please place your question in the appropriate section https://xpenology.com/forum/forum/60-dsm-6x/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mosaati Posted June 23, 2020 Share #352 Posted June 23, 2020 I'm thinking about adding a 10GB card to my Xpenology machine. Looking through Amazon I found this card. https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B07VLC7LT3/ref=ox_sc_act_image_3?smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER&psc=1 Would it work with the 13.3 drivers? Any better alternative? Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IG-88 Posted June 23, 2020 Author Share #353 Posted June 23, 2020 1 hour ago, mosaati said: Would it work with the 13.3 drivers? someone ask about the Asus XG-C100C a few posts before and that uses the same chip (just a different phy, yours is sfp+), yes it should work Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vase Posted June 24, 2020 Share #354 Posted June 24, 2020 Could you help me. I use original jun 1.03b loader (3617xs) with DSM 6.2.3. But I want to install realtek 8125 NIC. I change extra.lzma, zImage and rd.gz files. Make fresh install on empty HDD. But synology assistent can't find the NAS. For DSM 6.2.2 it works, but I don't want to return to 6.2.2(because annoying update notification in the control panel ). Or maybe there is a way to install the rtl8125 driver. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IG-88 Posted June 24, 2020 Author Share #355 Posted June 24, 2020 2 hours ago, vase said: For DSM 6.2.2 it works, thats strange as 0.6 for 6.2.2 and 0.11_2 for 6.2.3 use the same driver source (9.002.02) in the next version will be a slightly newer version of the driver (9.003.05) but i guess if 6.2.2 works the its not about the driver version the drivers for realtek are already done, but i was waiting to have newer intel versions and all same version in all three extra's on a quick glance i can't see that anything in the 3617 0.11_2 is wrong can you provide a log like /var/log/dmesg so maybe we can see if there is any error message Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vase Posted June 24, 2020 Share #356 Posted June 24, 2020 1 hour ago, IG-88 said: thats strange as 0.6 for 6.2.2 and 0.11_2 for 6.2.3 use the same driver source (9.002.02) thats strange but I prepared the image again and now it works. Maybe i just forgot to change vid/pid that time. Nevertheless thank you! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IG-88 Posted June 24, 2020 Author Share #357 Posted June 24, 2020 Just now, vase said: Maybe i just forgot to change vid/pid that time no, wrong vid/pid would not prevent it to be found in network, it would later prevent installing more likely wrong extra.lzma and the driver crashed on boot, most people dont use a serial console so they would not see Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mervincm Posted June 24, 2020 Share #358 Posted June 24, 2020 On 6/21/2020 at 4:48 AM, mosaati said: optimization job in Plex to transcode a high bitrate movie I am 99% sure plex will not use hardware transcode for optimization jobs. It only uses hardware transcoding for live transcoded video. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mosaati Posted June 25, 2020 Share #359 Posted June 25, 2020 2 hours ago, mervincm said: I am 99% sure plex will not use hardware transcode for optimization jobs. It only uses hardware transcoding for live transcoded video. I beg to differ, I am 100% sure it does. Evidence 1 Before going through all this I did an optimization job and the CPU was at 90% utilization for the whole time while the job is running. After applying the driver, CPU is not being USED that much, 3% maybe. Evidence 2 Before the driver the optimization ran at lower x rate than after applying it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NiGGaZ Posted July 2, 2020 Share #360 Posted July 2, 2020 (edited) Hi. I've prepared extra.lzma based on Juns patch and Custom loader for DS1019+ for DSM 6.2.3-25426, link below: https://mega.nz/file/pao0CQrb#_pLGNjTl-f7eneoWQgDkPklDoRCyqxJ_vhx_d79kIKg (only extra.lzma ~ 5.7Mb) You can find loader for DS1019+ on this forum or another place, you can remove both extra files from partition and use re-compiled. Then you need to download PAT files from https://archive.synology.com/download/DSM/release/6.2.3/25426/DSM_DS1019+_25426.pat, and just replace zImage and rd.gz Tested on ASUS N3150M-E (Lan: Realtek 8111H) and it works better then on loader for DS918+ (including extra) Edited July 2, 2020 by NiGGaZ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T-REX-XP Posted July 2, 2020 Share #361 Posted July 2, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, NiGGaZ said: Hi. I've prepared extra.lzma based on Juns patch and Custom loader for DS1019+ for DSM 6.2.3-25426, link below: https://mega.nz/file/pao0CQrb#_pLGNjTl-f7eneoWQgDkPklDoRCyqxJ_vhx_d79kIKg (only extra.lzma ~ 5.7Mb) You can find loader for DS1019+ on this forum or another place, you can remove both extra files from partition and use re-compiled. Then you need to download PAT files from https://archive.synology.com/download/DSM/release/6.2.3/25426/DSM_DS1019+_25426.pat, and just replace zImage and rd.gz Tested on ASUS N3150M-E (Lan: Realtek 8111H) and it works better then on loader for DS918+ (including extra) Cool, It will be great when we will see the difference. So, what is changed? Thanks. Edited July 2, 2020 by T-REX-XP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IG-88 Posted July 2, 2020 Author Share #362 Posted July 2, 2020 2 hours ago, NiGGaZ said: Tested on ASUS N3150M-E (Lan: Realtek 8111H) and it works better then on loader for DS918+ (including extra) why is ist better? it looks like as he drivers are just repackaged from my "extra918plus_v0.6_test.zip" from 10/2019 and that version was for 6.2.2 not for 6.2.3 also the patch inside the extra does not patch the amount of drives so people using this will be limited to the default of 5 drives for this unit the original hardware ist the same as 918+, no added functionality by this model this extra.lzma looks the same as the one inside a "ds1019+6.22.img" i downloaded from china last december to have a look what they where doing 2 hours ago, NiGGaZ said: I've prepared extra.lzma what did you change/add? 2 hours ago, NiGGaZ said: based on Juns patch and Custom loader for DS1019+ imho thats not jun's loader anymore, its based on his loader the poeple who did it also changes juns info.txt Intro: This mod is based on the basic modification made by Jun. You can contact me to discuss technical details, but general installation issues should be resolved through forums or other communities. by:QQ124718842 QQ Group:630756404 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NiGGaZ Posted July 2, 2020 Share #363 Posted July 2, 2020 (edited) 9 минут назад, IG-88 сказал: why is ist better? it looks like as he drivers are just repackaged from my "extra918plus_v0.6_test.zip" from 10/2019 and that version was for 6.2.2 not for 6.2.3 also the patch inside the extra does not patch the amount of drives so people using this will be limited to the default of 5 drives for this unit the original hardware ist the same as 918+, no added functionality by this model this extra.lzma looks the same as the one inside a "ds1019+6.22.img" i downloaded from china last december to have a look what they where doing what did you change/add? imho thats not jun's loader anymore, its based on his loader the poeple who did it also changes juns info.txt Intro: This mod is based on the basic modification made by Jun. You can contact me to discuss technical details, but general installation issues should be resolved through forums or other communities. by:QQ124718842 QQ Group:630756404 Hi IG-88 I will try to send more information later, but I've just re-packed extra. And additioanlly prepared loader, you can find it by link https://mega.nz/file/ESw1lCIK#_RIGEaKHXn5loScfmAnkyEjHczSVv_v3xE5wr9K0HT0 And you right it's based on QQ124718842. Currently I'm testing, and most of performance looks better. Edited July 2, 2020 by NiGGaZ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IG-88 Posted July 2, 2020 Author Share #364 Posted July 2, 2020 5 minutes ago, NiGGaZ said: Currently I'm testing, and most of performance looks better. did you use a differen realtek driver? pitty the people in china removed the 16 drive part of jun's patch if you want to maintain this a little i could try to make a adapted patch that has the 16 drives, i was planing to do it for 3615/17 anyway as stated above, the drivers you are using are made for 6.2.2, that version had different kernel settings you would need to use drivers from extra.lzma/extra2.lzma for loader 1.04b ds918+ DSM 6.2.3 v0.10 or above Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NiGGaZ Posted July 2, 2020 Share #365 Posted July 2, 2020 2 минуты назад, IG-88 сказал: did you use a differen realtek driver? I tried to load another version of realtek drivers, but there was some version differences of kernel. 5 минут назад, IG-88 сказал: pitty the people in china removed the 16 drive part of jun's patch Yes, I've removed too. Because for me it's not necessary, I got only 2 sata ports. (Sorry if removed) 7 минут назад, IG-88 сказал: if you want to maintain this a little i could try to make a adapted patch that has the 16 drives, i was planing to do it for 3615/17 anyway I've interested to maintain. From the beginning of lockdown 10 минут назад, IG-88 сказал: as stated above, the drivers you are using are made for 6.2.2, that version had different kernel settings you would need to use drivers from extra.lzma/extra2.lzma for loader 1.04b ds918+ DSM 6.2.3 v0.10 or above I used extra2 made for 6.2.2, but currently loaded 6.2.3 and it works fine! You're right about kernel, I've tried to compile kernel from sourceforge, but results wasn't good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IG-88 Posted July 2, 2020 Author Share #366 Posted July 2, 2020 20 minutes ago, NiGGaZ said: I used extra2 made for 6.2.2, but currently loaded 6.2.3 and it works fine! i guess your i915 driver for hardware transcoding is not working that way (/dev/dri) also jun's patches in extra and extra2 are different 24 minutes ago, NiGGaZ said: Yes, I've removed too. Because for me it's not necessary, I got only 2 sata ports. (Sorry if removed) ahh, so it was you, not the people who adapted the patch in the first place why? it does not hurt in any way to have more "slots" in the web gui, it will only limit the usability for other people i'd tend to up the 16 to 24 as this is a tested number of disks and will be enough in 99.9% of the cases Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NiGGaZ Posted July 2, 2020 Share #367 Posted July 2, 2020 4 минуты назад, IG-88 сказал: i guess your i915 driver for hardware transcoding is not working that way (/dev/dri) Perhaps it is, because when I read logs there was something about DRM. 6 минут назад, IG-88 сказал: ahh, so it was you, not the people who adapted the patch in the first place why? it does not hurt in any way to have more "slots" in the web gui, it will only limit the usability for other people IMHO: I just imagine about weak motherboard with 16 slots... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IG-88 Posted July 2, 2020 Author Share #368 Posted July 2, 2020 1 minute ago, NiGGaZ said: MHO: I just imagine about weak motherboard with 16 slots... not everyone build that "small" i'm using a i3 9100, the 8 cores of the kernel is starting to be a limit 14 minutes ago, NiGGaZ said: Perhaps it is, because when I read logs there was something about DRM. you can have a look at my newer 6.2.3 extra's for 918+, i removed the i915 driver from the package and modded the patch to delete the old one when present (like when updating from 6.2.x to 6.2.3) + +/tmpRoot/usr/bin/rm -f /tmpRoot/usr/lib/modules/update/agpgart.ko +/tmpRoot/usr/bin/rm -f /tmpRoot/usr/lib/modules/update/cfbcopyarea.ko +/tmpRoot/usr/bin/rm -f /tmpRoot/usr/lib/modules/update/cfbfillrect.ko +/tmpRoot/usr/bin/rm -f /tmpRoot/usr/lib/modules/update/cfbimgblt.ko +/tmpRoot/usr/bin/rm -f /tmpRoot/usr/lib/modules/update/drm.ko +/tmpRoot/usr/bin/rm -f /tmpRoot/usr/lib/modules/update/drm_kms_helper.ko +/tmpRoot/usr/bin/rm -f /tmpRoot/usr/lib/modules/update/fb.ko +/tmpRoot/usr/bin/rm -f /tmpRoot/usr/lib/modules/update/fb_sys_fops.ko +/tmpRoot/usr/bin/rm -f /tmpRoot/usr/lib/modules/update/i915.ko +/tmpRoot/usr/bin/rm -f /tmpRoot/usr/lib/modules/update/intel-agp.ko +/tmpRoot/usr/bin/rm -f /tmpRoot/usr/lib/modules/update/intel-gtt.ko +/tmpRoot/usr/bin/rm -f /tmpRoot/usr/lib/modules/update/syscopyarea.ko +/tmpRoot/usr/bin/rm -f /tmpRoot/usr/lib/modules/update/sysfillrect.ko +/tmpRoot/usr/bin/rm -f /tmpRoot/usr/lib/modules/update/sysimgblt.ko + Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fangzhen2005 Posted July 5, 2020 Share #369 Posted July 5, 2020 I bought an Intel i350-am2 nic, and my motherboard is j4105. DSM version 6.2.3 25426 extra.lzma v0.13.3 Entering the system did not recognize the NIC. dmesge.log show Quote [Sun Jul 5 12:17:33 2020] igb 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002) [Sun Jul 5 12:17:33 2020] igb 0000:01:00.0: The NVM Checksum Is Not Valid [Sun Jul 5 12:17:33 2020] igb: probe of 0000:01:00.0 failed with error -5 [Sun Jul 5 12:17:33 2020] igb 0000:01:00.1: enabling device (0000 -> 0002) [Sun Jul 5 12:17:33 2020] igb 0000:01:00.1: The NVM Checksum Is Not Valid [Sun Jul 5 12:17:33 2020] igb: probe of 0000:01:00.1 failed with error -5 But when I use win10 PE, it can recognize the network card normally I want to remove nvm checksum, let it always return 0, and recompile igb.ko. I follow https://xpenology.club/compile-drivers-xpenology-with-windows-10-and-build-in-bash/ How to do it, Downloaded https://sourceforge.net/projects/dsgpl/files/Synology%20NAS%20GPL%20Source/24922branch/apollolake-source/linux-4.4.x.txz/download and https://sourceforge.net/projects/dsgpl/files/DSM%206.2.2%20Tool%20Chains/Intel%20x86%20Linux%204.4.59%20%28Apollolake%29/apollolake-gcc493_ glibc220_ linaro_ x86_ 64- GPL.txz/download and Igb-5.3.5.61 source code I modify it Quote s32 e1000_ validate_ nvm_ checksum_ generic(struct e1000_ hw *hw) { s32 ret_ val; u16 checksum = 0; u16 i, nvm_ data; DEBUGFUNC("e1000_ validate_ nvm_ checksum_ generic"); for (i = 0; i < (NVM_ CHECKSUM_ REG + 1); i++) { ret_ val = hw-> nvm.ops.read (hw, i, 1, &nvm_ data); if (ret_ val) { DEBUGOUT("NVM Read Error\n"); return ret_ val; } checksum += nvm_ data; } if (checksum != (u16) NVM_ SUM) { DEBUGOUT("NVM Checksum Invalid\n"); return -E1000_ ERR_ NVM; } return E1000_ SUCCESS; } Make it always return to success I successfully compiled it igb.ko But when I inmod this file, I will prompt insmod: error: could not insert module / lib / modules / update/ igb.ko : Invalid module format I don't know where the wrong operation caused this problem. How to compile correctly igb.ko? igb.ko Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fangzhen2005 Posted July 5, 2020 Share #370 Posted July 5, 2020 1 hour ago, fangzhen2005 said: I bought an Intel i350-am2 nic, and my motherboard is j4105. DSM version 6.2.3 25426 extra.lzma v0.13.3 I solved the problem download intel bootUtil, and invoke Quote chmod +x ./bootutil64e sudo ./bootutil64e -NIC 1 -defcfg igb.ko Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IG-88 Posted July 5, 2020 Author Share #371 Posted July 5, 2020 6 hours ago, fangzhen2005 said: I successfully compiled it igb.ko But when I inmod this file, I will prompt insmod: error: could not insert module / lib / modules / update/ igb.ko : Invalid module format I don't know where the wrong operation caused this problem. How to compile correctly igb.ko? means wrong version number of kernel, you would need to change the makefile synology delivered https://xpenology.com/forum/topic/7187-how-to-build-and-inject-missing-drivers-in-jun-loader-102a/?do=findComment&comment=122631 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terryxman Posted July 5, 2020 Share #372 Posted July 5, 2020 http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=02983560703604932651 The driver link that you released including r8125 has expired and cannot be downloaded. Can you give me a new link? Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fangzhen2005 Posted July 5, 2020 Share #373 Posted July 5, 2020 3 hours ago, IG-88 said: means wrong version number of kernel, you would need to change the makefile synology delivered https://xpenology.com/forum/topic/7187-how-to-build-and-inject-missing-drivers-in-jun-loader-102a/?do=findComment&comment=122631 OK, I see. Thank you for your reply. I'll try again later Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IG-88 Posted July 5, 2020 Author Share #374 Posted July 5, 2020 (edited) 5 hours ago, terryxman said: The driver link that you released including r8125 has expired and cannot be downloaded. Can you give me a new link? Thank you. my delete link was still valid, so they must have a interesting way to determine the 100 days for not downloading anyway its up again with a new link Edited July 5, 2020 by IG-88 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terryxman Posted July 5, 2020 Share #375 Posted July 5, 2020 Thanks a lot~~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.