NiGGaZ

Transition Members
  • Content Count

    14
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

NiGGaZ last won the day on March 13 2020

NiGGaZ had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

5 Neutral

About NiGGaZ

  • Rank
    Newbie

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Curious! I've tested network speed with iperf3 (on synology with docker). I'm shocked! Then why copying through ordinary network not so good!?
  2. Comparing Read/Write speed between DS1019+ (chinese, repacked) and DS918+ (from this forum loaders). Hardware: ASUS N3150M-E, Lan: Realtek 8111H, SSD: Samsung 128Gb (Sata 3Gbps). File: approx. 2,52 GB img Strange, but DS1019+ (W: ~63-65 Mb/s, R: ~66-67 Mb/s) copying faster then DS918+ (W: ~50-58 Mb/s, R: ~60-62 Mb/s). Checked on another HDD WD 1Tb: DS1019+ (W: ~39-45 Mb/s, R: ~40-47 Mb/s) copying faster then DS918+ (W: ~30-36 Mb/s, R: ~36-38 Mb/s). Maybe someone can explain why it so!? DS918+ Wrinting (SSD Samsung 128Gb) DS918+ Reading (SSD Samsu
  3. Perhaps it is, because when I read logs there was something about DRM. IMHO: I just imagine about weak motherboard with 16 slots...
  4. I tried to load another version of realtek drivers, but there was some version differences of kernel. Yes, I've removed too. Because for me it's not necessary, I got only 2 sata ports. (Sorry if removed) I've interested to maintain. From the beginning of lockdown I used extra2 made for 6.2.2, but currently loaded 6.2.3 and it works fine! You're right about kernel, I've tried to compile kernel from sourceforge, but results wasn't good.
  5. Hi IG-88 I will try to send more information later, but I've just re-packed extra. And additioanlly prepared loader, you can find it by link https://mega.nz/file/ESw1lCIK#_RIGEaKHXn5loScfmAnkyEjHczSVv_v3xE5wr9K0HT0 And you right it's based on QQ124718842. Currently I'm testing, and most of performance looks better.
  6. Hi. I've prepared extra.lzma based on Juns patch and Custom loader for DS1019+ for DSM 6.2.3-25426, link below: https://mega.nz/file/pao0CQrb#_pLGNjTl-f7eneoWQgDkPklDoRCyqxJ_vhx_d79kIKg (only extra.lzma ~ 5.7Mb) You can find loader for DS1019+ on this forum or another place, you can remove both extra files from partition and use re-compiled. Then you need to download PAT files from https://archive.synology.com/download/DSM/release/6.2.3/25426/DSM_DS1019+_25426.pat, and just replace zImage and rd.gz Tested on ASUS N3150M-E (Lan: Realtek 8111H) and it works better
  7. - Outcome of the update: SUCCESSFUL - DSM version prior update: DSM 6.2.2-24922 Update 6 - Loader version and model: Jun's v1.04b - DS918+ - Using custom extra.lzma: Repacked extra.lzma (based on Jun's Extra 918+ v0.8 syno) - Installation type: BAREMETAL - ASUS N3150M-E rev. 1.02 (MicroATX) / Removed 16 disks support, MB equipped only 2 x 6Gb SATA - Additional comment: WOL works only if use native MAC address.
  8. Привет. Вот только что установил и обновил до актуальной DSM 6.2.2-24922 Update 6. Сразу оговорюсь, что 918+ никак не идет, диск теряет при обновлении. Устанавливал (for DS3615xs) - v1.03b (extra) и обязательно прописывал загрузочную запись как гибридная.
  9. Why I’m asking, because I’ve updated my HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT to 6.2.2, but that was not so smooth.
  10. Synology DSM 6.1 (xpenology) Lets Encrypt ACMEv1 to ACMEv2 If you get messages like: synoscgi_SYNO.Core.Certificate.LetsEncrypt_1_create[5038]: certificate.cpp:957 syno-letsencrypt failed. 200 [new-req, unexpect httpcode] synoscgi_SYNO.Core.Certificate.LetsEncrypt_1_create[5038]: certificate.cpp:1359 Failed to create Let'sEncrypt certificate. [200][new-req, unexpect httpcode] Then you need to upgrade your DSM up to version 6.2 or replace execution (syno-letsencrypt) file and some changes in configuarion file: 1. Download file syno-letsencrypt (this file from DSM v6.2) link https: