Leaderboard

Hello! Made a small model matching table: TVS-682 QX760_QX770_13_13 TVS-882 QX760_QX780_10_10 TVS-882 QX761_QX780_12_12 TVS-882 QX761_QX780_13_12 TVS-682 QX762_QX770_12_13 TVS-682 QX762_QX770_13_13 TVS-882 QX763_QX780_12_12 TVS-882 QX763_QX780_13_12 TVS-1282 QX790_QX800_10_10 TVS-1282 QX790_QX800_12_11 TVS-1282 QX790_QX800_13_11 TVS-1282 QX791_QX800_12_11 TVS-1282 QX791_QX800_13_11 TVS-682 QZ010_QX770_13_13 TVS-682 QZ011_QX770_13_13 TVS-882 QZ020_QX780_13_12 TVS-882 QZ021_QX780_13_12 TVS-1282 QZ030_QX800_13_11 TVS-882BR QZ030_QY880_10_10 TVS-882BR QZ030_QY880_10_12 TVS-1282 QZ031_QX800_13_11 TVS-882BR QZ032_QY880_10_12 TVS-882BR QZ033_QY880_10_12 TVS-682 QX760_QX770_10_10 TVS-682 QX760_QX770_12_13 TX-800P TBJBOD_QW580_QW750_20_20 TX-500P TBJBOD_QW580_QX180_20_20

I use \\ip.addr internally on my home network and so i was able to get 110mb/s transferspeeds. I have bought a domain name attached to my ip addr(ext) that i use so no need to write the port number; just reading what u said i think it makes sense now. I forgot to realize my parents have 200mb up and down. Would this result in 27/35 mb/s speeds? (Reading again; ah mbit not mbs. So outside seems right) Everything at home is 1gbit or even 10gbit. No 100mbit routings here. You fixed my issue 😁 my parents took a downgrade it seems without telling me. All fine. Thanks jens

Agreed. Thank you so much for your effort and patience. I'll keep hammering with transcoding jobs to test it for stability. i made a change to the 1st post about that and upload a zip file containing the 3 versions of the i915.ko for the newer UHD 630 desktop iGPU's (and i removed the two test versions from my post's above so to make sure there is no confusion of what is used)

Side note for anyone want to use this. I checked the codec activation status by using more /usr/syno/etc/codec/activation.conf and I got a success but no codecs due to wrong serial. I used the patch in the following post to fix it and codecs are listed now.

I created an optimization job in Plex to transcode a high bitrate movie (22.2Mbps) to 4Mbps while watching another movie live transcoding to 4Mbps and noticed while the transcoding job is running, It would go non stop with no issues. But If I started watching a live transcoding movie the job would stop momentarily for like 10 seconds and continue transcoding and would keep doing this till finishing the job. Nevertheless, the optimization job finished completely with no errors.

i'd guess lesting it by running on a extra long movie and some different formats (h.265?) will be enough to make a basic test not a nice solution but it works and can be done for newer versions too (if synology updates dsm and replaces i915.ko) anyone with a 10th gen intel cpu for testing the same with s newly patched version? (it also "just" UHD Graphics 630)

Agreed. Thank you so much for your effort and patience. I'll keep hammering with transcoding jobs to test it for stability.

looks fine, as it should be only uncertainty is if its stable, bat that can only be answered after using it extensively at least we have a working solution for people with that cpu's if they want to use hardware transcoding, i will update the 1st post later and link to the file

Yes it exists now. But I'm not sure what the contents should be. Are the files in the in dev/dri in the attached picture correct?

usually, its the presence of /dev/dri (and devices in there) so check if that is the case

Out of excitement I tried it and it seems Hardware Acceleration is working in Plex. But if there is another way to make sure I'll be happy to test. Or should I count this as a success?!

Command output insmod: ERROR: could not insert module /usr/lib/modules/i915.ko: File exists The good news dev/dri exists now. Does that mean it should do hardware acceleration?