Jump to content
XPEnology Community

pocopico

Developer
  • Posts

    1,753
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    123

Posts posted by pocopico

  1. 19 hours ago, Joewydiart said:

    I am doing a network speed test, my speed sending data to my nas is super slow.

    I dont understand your question, how is it that I reached the limit of my nic? Xpenology wont go faster that that? 

    My confusion here is that same buil, same everything, nothing changed, in Truenas i was getting speeds over network of 250+ mb's and that is not the case here. No I want to state that I am deeply grateful of you guys trying to help me out with this, but my knowledge here is very limited.

    I am going to take a look at those links and try it.

     

    No you are mistaken. its 260MegaBytes and not 260megabits. A 1Gb link will normally have a throuput rate of 100MB/s so a 2.5G will have 250MB/s.

    • Like 1
  2. 3 hours ago, Joewydiart said:

    Interesting. Well I have 3x 14 tb hdd Sata drives. And when I was using TrueNAS transfer speeds were similar to yours, that's no the case using xpenology. Any idea why? 

     

    Is this a network test or a disk benchmark test ? I'm asking cause in both cases you were both able to reach the throughput limit of the 2.5Gb card (read or write). 

     

    I like to use diskspd (https://github.com/microsoft/diskspd) for storage benchmarks. In order to test throughput you set the block size to large numbers e.g. 1MB and in order to test IOPS you can use smaller numbers e.g. 4K or 8K

     

    so you can map your drive in a windows machine and check the below cmd line examples.

     

    https://github.com/Microsoft/diskspd/wiki/Sample-command-lines

     

     

  3. Hi, find my anwsers inline :

     

    Q1 What I would like to know mainly that the list above would work on a DVA1622 or not? ,

    A1 You need to try and see, i see no reason not to work.

    Q2 Can DVA1622 handle more than 2 disks?

    A2 Yes

    Q3 What about plex transcoding? Is that working on DVA1622? 

    A3 Since /dev/dri is working i would expect that to work also for the transcoding 

    Q4 I've read somewhere that DVA1622's Survstation AI is working with Intel's built in GPU but DVA3221 needs separated GPU for that. Is that right?

    A4 Thats right. 

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  4. 14 minutes ago, Peter Suh said:

    According to the instructions of pocopico, in M SHELL

     

    You can choose from the following 3 modes:
    DDSML (modprobe+insmod) Only
    DDSML + EUDEV
    EUDEV Only

     

    In the sas module affected by the above, it seems that EUDEV Only needs to be adjusted so that it is not used.

     

    Only the systems that include scsi_transport_sas (e.g. ds3622xs+) will fail to load mpt3sas/hpsa/mvsas using EUDEV. The rest will load properly the modules

    • Thanks 1
  5. 1 hour ago, Peter Suh said:

     

    It seems that wjz304 has some improvements related to the format error of mpt3sas that was modified a while ago.


    I will review it and apply it to M SHELL for TCRP as well.

     

    https://github.com/wjz304/arpl-modules/commit/d10a7519c8ab492651bc2c727e828eab3ced0263

     

    MPT3SAS will fail to load using eudev cause it is exporting duplicate scsi_transport_sas symbols. This has been solved on latest all-modules tcrp-addon.

    • Thanks 1
  6. Just now, ratatuy17 said:

    HPE SmartArray p420i
    8 disks connected, 2 Arrays made

     

    Forget it, I saw the first post ! Are the disks on the smartarray set up as JBOD? I dont think that HW RAID is supported.

  7. Do you know where are the disks physically connected ?  On which adapter on lspci output ? 

     

    Forget it, I saw the first post ! Are the disks on the smartarray set up as JBOD? 

  8. 27 minutes ago, ratatuy17 said:

    I need help setting up disks, I do not know how to configure them.

     

    OK, can you SSH to the DSM and run the following 

     

    fdisk -l |grep sd 

    lspci -nnq 

    ls /sys/class/ata_port 

    ls /sys/class/sas_phy

    ls /sys/class/scsi_disk

     

     

     

  9. 22 minutes ago, ratatuy17 said:

    sorry

     

    internalportcfg="0x1"
    usbportcfg="0xf00000"

     

     

    You should have something like internalportcfg="0xffff" 

     

    its a representation of the following binary 

     

        maxdisks=24                             
        internalportcfg="0xffffff"     0000 0000 0000 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111
        esataportcfg="0xff000000"      0000 1111 1111 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
        usbportcfg="0xf00000000"       1111 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000

     

    meaning you have 24 ports and each port is enabled by having its value set to 1 

     

    the usbportcfg shound not overlap the internalportcfg. 

     

    Which loader are you using and what addon are you using for disks ? 

     

     

  10. 7 hours ago, ratatuy17 said:

    sorry for the translation 🙏
    the Russian community ignores

     

    can you check the following values in /etc/synoinfo.conf

     

    grep internalportcfg /etc/synoinfo.conf

    grep usbport /etc/synoinfo.conf
     

  11. 5 hours ago, Peter Suh said:

     

    The actual operation of modprobe.blacklist=mlx4, an idea suggested by @pocopico, is in the Junior stage where the arpl/tcrp integrated module pack tgz is actually used (Early) or the intermediate stage just before DSM is loaded (Passed Junior - Late). I know.

     

    I know that this tgz is discarded at the loading stage of DSM and only works as a vanilla module.

     

    Doesn't the tgz integration module and the vanilla module in DSM have no correlation at the time of rcExit past the Late stage, which is the loading stage of DSM?

     

    @pocopico, @wjz304

    I'm also asking because I can't establish the concept of this part.

     

    Its true but the cmdline is persistent and DSM modprobe will continue to blacklist the module past junior. 

    • Thanks 1
  12. 3 minutes ago, djvas335 said:

    But I do not want to exclude the module mlx4 from loading in DSM, I want that the mlx4 module included in all-modules in the loader do not load so that the module included in DSM loads, the mlx4 included in the all-modules does not work and crashes my system when I access after the system started up. So what I want is for the vanilla mlx4 driver in DSM take over from the mlx4 included in the all-modules pack.

     

     

     

    Sure, thats also a very valid option. You can change the tgz by adding or removing modules. The initial idea that we discussed with @fbelavenuto , was to match the redpill to the Juns loader extra module pack function. 

    • Thanks 2
  13. 9 hours ago, Peter Suh said:

     

    Currently, this mlx4 has been removed from the DDSML method of MSHELL for TCRP.
    In this removed state, the built-in modules (vanilla modules) already included in DSM are used instead.It has already been reflected in M SHELL by your

     

    request a while ago, What other problems are there?

    I didn't have your last feedback, so I asked another user with the same nic to test it. There was nothing wrong with his feedback.

     

    In addition, if the user wants to exclude modules with additional issues,

    I am considering using modprobe.blacklist in MSHELL's DDSML method using modprobe.

     

     

    Since we are using gnu tar to extract the modules at boot or at loader creation the exclusion of some modules is not a very difficult task.

     

    If you want to specify a module to be excluded from DSM you can add modprobe.blacklist=mlx4 at your linux command line. 

     

    I will include that in the next release of the HTML Builder.

     

    How we identify the module that actually cause KPs is the most difficult part cause you have to read the KP message.

     

     

    • Like 1
  14. On 6/10/2023 at 5:22 AM, god-like said:

    Ok - After a bit of trial and error. I've gotten somewhere.

     

    Since there are 6 ports, I figured first off I should set SataPortMap=6

     

    I then set DiskIdxMap=01 (meaning to start with sdb - which is the 2nd drive - 00 being sda which is my vmdk)

     

    After doing this - I was able to install, but oddly, it's showing up as disk 3 in the unit. (which doesnt make sense to me as I told it to start the index at the second disk) - unless I'm misunderstanding how this works. Well, regardless, this is something:

     

    image.thumb.png.98cb190b3404445fa373e7389d78d4e8.png

     

    If you have more than one SATA controllers, the minimum disk setting per controller is 1 (setting to zero will KP). SataPortMap is a single character per controller e.g. lets say you have four controllers, but all disks are on fourth controller. You have to specify one disk on first, one on second, one on third and eight on the forth controller, SataportMap=1118. 

     

    Now as for DiskIdxMap, it is a two digit hex value per controller. For the above example you can set DiskIdxMap=0A0B0C00 and then the first disk on the first controller will be pushed down to 0A(hex), the second controller disk will be pushed to 0B, the disk on the third controller will be push to 0C and the disk on the forth controller will start from position 00 (slot1 on the schematic), the second will occupy the slot2 etc.

     

     

     

  15. 1 hour ago, Peter Suh said:

     

    The hardware environment is the Intel DG45ID and Q8300 Core 2 Quad mentioned above.
    I used mpt3sas controller.

     

    Is it correct to search like this in Download Station?
    Also, I'm not familiar with video stations because I rarely use them.
    I stayed and tried 1 movie and 1 drama and 1 series.
    Indexing appears to be stuck. Thumbnails for each movie also don't seem to be displayed.
    Is it true that one succeeds and the other fails?

     

    2023-06-2112_48_02.thumb.png.a1ad63654543a3aa9d98031dc243bfb8.png2023-06-211_06_18.thumb.png.bf75ffadcd475c46179f1463085b231b.png2023-06-211_06_38.thumb.png.b344077db38190f3547f892adb3025fe.png2023-06-211_08_32.thumb.png.61836b64b616e6e3b7b6aaf865a35b5e.png

     

    Thanks, the search constantly fails even after numerous re-installs and retries 

     

  16. 3 minutes ago, wjz304 said:

    @pocopico Brother, I don't have a core2duo,

    My PVE simulating core2duo will fail to run, I don't know if it's because it's an AMD cpu.

    My current environment is indeed very poor, I only have one N5105 board and AMD 5600X's PVE.1029.gif.7d2c31150d377670fdbfa4649306811e.gif

    Perhaps i can be tested on Win through QEMU, but the significance of simulation testing may not be significant,

    Are there any other testing methods?

     

    Unfortunately i'am also somehow limited on resources. I currently test mainly on VMware and on some personal production/semi-production systems.

  17. 29 minutes ago, Peter Suh said:

     

    @pocopico

     

    Isn't there an issue with the ata_piix module on older platforms?

     

    https://www.kernelconfig.io/config_ata?q=&kernelversion=4.4.302&arch=x86

     

    config ATA_PIIX

    tristate "Intel ESB, ICH, PIIX3, PIIX4 PATA/SATA support"

    depends on PCI

    help

    This option enables support for ICH5/6/7/8 Serial ATA

    and support for PATA on the Intel ESB/ICH/PIIX3/PIIX4 series host controllers.

     

    Are there other disk controller modules that can replace the onboard controller, the ata_piix module?

     

    You may be able to use an alternative controller card if it has a PCI-E interface, but most likely it will be a PCI interface.

     

    Its not my issue, my system has ICH8 with AHCI SATA ports.

  18. After upgrading a DS3622xs DSM system with Core2duo CPU to 7.2 (or U1) i've noticed that are certain functions that fail to execute. E.g. Downloadstation cannot perform search, Video station cannot index files etc. Some basic functions will still work though e.g. the DSM UI, the File manager etc. but i'm worring about CPU compatibility issues of older systems. Maybe older CPU users should stay at 7.1.1 U6 

     

    @wjz304 I'm planning to test using ARPL-i18n to see if its on my end, but since my schedule is tight, could you in the meantime verify somehow ? 

  19. On 5/31/2023 at 11:24 PM, Peter Suh said:

     

    thank you It means that the vanilla module alone may be lacking in PID/VID compatibility. In the recompilation process, more PID/VID are added to increase this compatibility.

     

    Its related to the PCIID (pci alias) of the module and the support of the module for these specific PCIIDs

  20. 1 hour ago, pLastUn said:

    Ок,

    Downloaded the latest TCRP image today.
    Started it up and did all the actions from the HTML.

    The screenshot says "Failed to install file. File may be corrupted".

    PAT file DSM_DS3617xs_42962.pat is original, downloaded from Synology website.

     

     

    3617.frend.JPG

    3617.screen.JPG

     

    Is this a proxmox VM ? Did you use the PAT file that you downloaded from Syno ? 

     

    At 55% corrupted file the usb vid:pid is usually wrong and synoboot is not shimmed properly , can you check using http://yourip:7681 (root/no password) the existence of synoboot with fdisk -l ?  Also lsusb can be helpful. 

     

  21. 58 minutes ago, djvas335 said:

    I have below error when trying to build latest loader and DSM

     

    [#] Verifying /home/tc/redpill-load/custom/extensions/disks/ds3622xsp_64570/install.sh file...  [ERR]
    [!] Checksum mismatch - expected 63d8722edb9c5f7cb7160bead82e2909bb977a1aad96dff74f39629fde03c3bf but computed d1f4003ea029a2f44db3c105e04f245a87e6c0d0b1685ff237d2278b55e43481

    *** Process will exit ***
     

    Fixed

×
×
  • Create New...