Jump to content
XPEnology Community

billat29

Member
  • Posts

    351
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

Posts posted by billat29

  1. Thanks for the update, quicknick.

     

    So, everyone, it is clear. Obviously Real Life has caught up with quicknick and while he has the desire to finish it, he just can't find the time at the moment. When he does find the time, he will deliver it. His estimate is a "few weeks" but it's all going to depend on what else he has to do. There's no point in trying to get a better estimate. It will be done when it is done.

    So in the meantime we can:

    1) Stop asking

    and either

    1) Stay on 5.2

    2) Use jun's loader

    3) Buy a real Synology :smile:

     

    I expect that when it is ready for release, Quicknick will update the title of the thread and we will all know.

  2.  

    Also, when you say comment out/delete or add something in the script, I'm expecting to open a file to edit it (for example in NotePad++), but it's not the case since it is through SSH, I'm not quite sure to understand how it works. Can you clarify a little more please and send a screenshot of what I should expect?

     

    Oh dear! You are at the start of a steep learning curve.

    So.When you use SSH, you are opening a remote console onto the linux system that underlies DSM. vi and nano are standard linux editors which run on that box and you can use either of them to change one of the files that DSM uses. It's a matter of personal preference which one you choose. If your favourite is not already installed, you can always install your editor of choice.

     

    You can also look at WinSCP - a program to install on your windows machine which will allow you to connect to DSM and browse to the files you want to edit. You can right click on the files and then use Notepad++ as your editor. WinSCP will download the file to your Windows machine, allow you to edit, and when you save, put it back on the Xpenology box.

     

    Apart from the instructions which say this is the file to edit and these are the changes to make, this is all standard linux stuff, so you should be able to find help on how to do it in that community

  3. The link to the PAT file points to Synology's own servers. So they still work :smile:

    It looks like the files that were hosted there (IMG, ISO etc) aren't currently accessible there.

    I also looked on xpenology.fr and xpenology.us and they are all down.

    However, if you goto the first page of the announcement XPEnoboot 5.2-5967.1 you might have more luck.

  4. Hi, I would like to setup xpenology 6.0.2 using VMware on my pc. My question is

     

    1) In regards to VMware, can this only be done using VMware EXSI or can I use VMware workstation?

     

    2) If I can't use VMware workstation, do I have to purchase vSphere in order for this to work?

     

    I currently am running xpenology 5.2 on hyper-v. Never had any issues and am familiar with the install process on hyper-v. Thank for any help that can be provided in getting me running using VMware.

    1)I have run jun's loader in VMware workstation player for testing. You don't have the flexibility in attaching hardware that ESXi does. But you can attach disks to the virtual machine

    2) You don't need vsphere with ESXi 5.5 as you can use the client from earlier releases. That does restrict what you can do. I did try ESXi6 and found a client, but I couldn't say whether I was running vsphere in a time limited evaluation mode or not.

  5. Hello Bill,

    Thank you for answering me. Sorry for my english (google translate :sad:)

    Yes I decided to update 6.02 and I have an error message

     

    error: failure reading sector 0x363d from 'hd0'

    error: failure reading sector 0x3561 from 'hd0'

    error: failure reading sector 0x3561 from 'hd0'

    Screen will stop updating shortly, please ope http://find.synology.com to continue

     

    Press any key to continue...

     

    Test with 1 hdd 80 go

    Test with 4 hdd 500 go

     

    I don't understand..

     

    thks

     

    I am confused about the last part where you say

    Test with 1 hdd 80 go

    Test with 4 hdd 500 go

    Does this mean you always get the same message with the same error sectors if you put different drives in your box?

     

    And does it say hd0 or md0. If it says md0, then you need to create the bootloader on another USB stick as yours is not working properly.

  6. Scal,

    Please tell us what you are doing.

    Are you installing on a new system or upgrading an existing system?

    What actions did you perform?

    At what step do you get the messages?

    Thanks

    Bill

  7. Hello all !

    I've successfully installed DSM6 using Jun V1.01. System is :

    - ESXi 6

    - LSI2008 in ITmode in PCI passthrough

     

    I currently still use a DSM 5.2 for 'production'. That means all home data (Documents/Media).

    It's now more than 1 month that everybody seems to be happy with the Jun's Loader.

     

    I'm asking myself now if it's safe enough to migrate production to DSM6.

    Any good or bad experience with a production DSM6 running on a similar setup ?

     

    Thanks for any input !!!

    KR,

    Tdutrieux

     

    I am sure that anyone close to the development would say that it's still not ready for production but we both know that people are using it successfully.

    I would only consider it if I had a complete backup of all my data and settings and I was prepared to spend all the time rebuilding the whole thing again if it went all wrong.

    I'm not migrating yet as USB on N54L doesn't seem to work.

  8. I successfully created a DSM6 key and booted my N54L and it is found on the network. So, I guess that there is a problem with the creation of your key.

    I followed this: ==> viewtopic.php?f=2&t=22100&p=76338#p76338

    but the changes I made to grub.cfg were to:

    set my VID and PID;

    set sn and mac;

    Sataportmap to 4

    and I got frustrated with trying to set the default boot menu item :???: and just deleted all the ones I didn't want leaving the AMD option.

  9. Hang on. So you originally booted from the DSM 6 key, it was found on the network and you updated it to DSM6 via the web interface. Now after the install, you can no longer find it on the network? Is it still booting with the AMD option?+

     

    And yes, you should be able to mount the disks under linux and recover. TI have seen a post somewhere and sometime on how to use mdadm to do so, but I can't remember where....... sorry

  10. That's good news.

    You need a version of the bootloader that matches the version of DSM you are trying to install. If you have the last x86 loader, then the matching DSM version is the latest you can install safely.

    You need nanoboot usb inserted whenever you boot DSM. It takes the place of the ROM bootloader in a real Synology but it allows you to load DSM on non-Synology hardware.

  11. Hi,

    I'm not sure why you are doing step 5, but that shouldn't affect things.

    I have tried to replicate your method but got lost in VMware hell.

    All I can say is that error 13 is a problem writing the installation to the disk - not big enough, wrong disk type, wrong controller, can't find it, wrong or bad .pat file but I'm sorry that I can't provide a solution.

    Maybe someone with a greater knowledge can help.....

  12. Sorry mate.

    I'm really confused about what you say about connecting to port 22 and trying to upload the DSM file. Are you trying to use WinSCP to physically upload the file or are you following the installation wizard that appears in the browser when you connect it to the nanoboot machine?

  13. Ah! I hadn't seen that thread before and now I see what you are doing.

    I am confused about the steps you have taken and why you are using port 22 at this point.

    It should be:

    1) Boot nanoboot in the VM

    2) from your PC run synology assistant to find the DSM instance.

    3) Right click on the instance and select connect to open a browser and start the installation process.

  14. Error 13 seems to be "I had some problem writing the installation to disk". 10Gb was probably not big enough.

    I did try to run up an old VM which was using Nanoboot but it failed and I have changed so much on my PC and network since then that it would probably take an age to debug.

    However, I did notice that the .pat file I was using was for the DS3612xs and that might be your error 13 problem there.

     

    As for x86 support, I think nanoboot was the last, but can't really remember. I would have to hunt through the forum for the 5.0 release - but then you could do that :smile:

  15. Not to be the party pooper here but I think that providing modified loaders from Jun's OP only serves to confuse people and also derails the efforts made so far. I know some are invested into helping others by adding additional drivers and compatibility options but I think it just makes this thread heavier and heavier to follow. I would recommend perhaps those who have the ability to compile code to do it in cooperation with Jun and then post as one. This would have the advantage of greatly improving readability and also making sure there is only one source of the loader. Maybe making a new thread with a proper loader name and versioning system would help. One person would be in charge of updating the OP when required. @jun @setsunakawa @quicknick @sweebee

     

    Please consider this.

     

    I'm with Polanskiman on this. I think what you guys are doing is fantastic but please, can we get this under control. I am sure that a small number of you are more than capable of building your own custom loader and getting it to work, but I worry that the vast majority of users have little idea of what is going on (many have just managed to stumble through the tutorials that used to live on fan sites) and it's all going to go horribly wrong for them.

    Can we mark this thread as "Development Only" or something like that and ask one of you guys to start another thread as he suggests.

    Please?

  16. The unknown is whether there are likely to be any issues in the jump from 5.0 to 5.2. I suspect most people will have upgraded in smaller steps as new versions became available. If you can test the upgrade using a spare HDD or a VM on your PC, that would give more confidence.

     

    Always back up your data first and also backup your configuration from control panel. Be prepared for loss of folder permissions and you might need to reinstall the odd package. Sometimes a hard boot after an upgrade is required.

     

    The latest bootloader is always referenced on the first page of this thread:

    viewtopic.php?f=2&t=5026

    and if you follow the first link, you will get to the correct bootloader and the corresponding .pat file which you can download to your PC.

     

    There are a couple of fan sites around that have tutorials - although sometimes not always updated regularly. Off the top of my head there are

    https://xpenology.us/tutorials (seems to be down at the moment)

    and

    http://xpenology.me/category/how-to/

     

    but essentially your method is OK. After rebooting, you need to connect to the box (synology assistant or find.synology.com) and it should show as migratable. You can then click the manual install and point to the .pat file you downloaded earlier.

    Good luck and did I say "back up your data" yet?

  17. 5967 is the latest. However, in fixing the BIOS reset problem, the devs stopped power schedules from working.

    I'm on 5644 which seems to work (although I'm not sure whether the fan runs in quiet mode any more) but if your box is not connected to the internet, I would be tempted to leave it as it is.

    However if it is accessible from the internet, I would probably move to a later release to get the security fixes.

  18. It might be time to run a file check on the volume.

    There are some instructions towards the bottom of this post https://tunwinnaing.wordpress.com/2015/ ... le-system/

    Disclaimer: I haven't tried it and don't know what effect it might have. However, it's only the second run of e2fsck that actually changes the filesystem.

    You can run the commands from WinSCP if you like Commands>Open Terminal or download something like putty.

×
×
  • Create New...