fma965
-
Posts
68 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by fma965
-
-
Short question.
Background: I did an update with Nanoboot 5.0.2.2 yesterday directly from Trantors beta 5, very easy. Web-GUI said its migrateable and I chose Migration (keep files and most of the settings). I assume clean installation (keep your files) would have led to a swipe of the hard drives.
Uploaded original pat file and it works without additional adjustments. Maybe that helps some people.
Question: In the pic you'll see that the little one as a reminder of an update did not disappear. Upon checking, it says, latest version installed. Why doesnt the red 1 disappear?
i don't have that issue
-
Does anybody have a guide of how to install nanoboot with 4482 from scratch, on a clean new physical machine?
fma965 made a very useful tutorial (thank you fma965!) http://cyanlabs.co.uk/tutorials/synolog ... o-nanoboot but it's talking about migration from gnoboot. Unfortunately it's a bit confusing, also because there's a lot of virtualization stuff all over the place.
Ok so people seem to want a guide specific to not using ESXi, i will see what i can do, as for fresh installs... well i can't seem to get that working, my best answer is just install gnoboot, once its booted to synology "desktop" shut it downa dn replace gnoboot with nanoboot then select upgrade/downgrade etc. etc.
-
I hope gnoBoot brings out a update soon.
+1
why not use nanoboot?
-
Are there any performance improvements with using the x64 nanoboot or not really is it more hardware compatibility..?
gnoboot and trantor have always been x64, nanoboot x64 wud be the best to use, x86 was added to support older/slower hardware
-
*waiting patiently for the HP Microserver guide*
EDIT: so what's the difference between the modified and unmodified PAT file?
EDIT2: when we moved from trantor -> gnoboot, we used "install" from syno assistant instead of the website. Does the website method retain user data?
*waiting patiently for the HP Microserver guide* --- it's essentially the same just don't use the vmdk and instead write the img to usb with win32diskimager.
not sure on whats different but at a guess i would say it's patched to work with non synology hardware, but with later versions of nanoboot the patching is done on the fly and stock pat file is used... for neive people who think using official file is more secure... well it's not, the file can be modified at run time and a averge user wouldn't know, not saying it is done or that it's done with malicious intent just saying.
AFAIK they are the same, i don't get all the complaining about me using the install option before as it worked fine for me yet people carried on complaining.
-
I'm running into an issue where it looks Nanoboot is not pulling IPs for the NICs. For hardware, i'm using the c2750d4i with marvel NICS coming from DSM5 with gnoboot 10.5a.
I get the error below on boot:
Running /usr/syno/etc/rc.d/J)3ssdps.sh...
/usr/syno/sbin/minissdpd
Usage: /usr/syno/sbin/minissdpd [-d] [-6] [-s socket] -[p pidfile] -i [-i ] ...
< interface> is eitehr an IPv4 address such as 192.168.1.42, or an
interface name such as eth0.
By defaulth, socket will be open as /var/run/minissdpd.sock
and pid written to file /var/run/minissdpd.pid
start SSDPD failed.
From the guide off cyanlabs, the execution line should be:
/usr/syno/sbin/minissdpd -i eth0 -i eth1
Any insight would be appreciated. Thanks in advanced.
it probably doesn't have drivers for that NIC, also what do you mean by "From the guide off cyanlabs, the execution line should be: /usr/syno/sbin/minissdpd -i eth0 -i eth1"?
-
Ahh oke!
I understand.
I do have another question though.
I now have a 1GB disk that is not initialised.
See screenshot:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/fvl3h92dqbf5w ... .57.20.png
Is that correct? Can it be removed?
read the bottom part of my tutorial it's the VMDK file once again, best bet would be to convert to a read only format but i haven't the time currently.
if you set the vdmk at IDE, and then rmmod=ata_piix it would solve it most likely. Right now removing ata_piix is broken, since it's compiled into the kernel rather than a kernel mod. The creator will fix it next release.
Yeah i know thanks though, Obviously since it's broke in this realease it seems pointless mentioning that
-
I should have read the whole tutorial!
Thanks mate
No problem
-
Ahh oke!
I understand.
I do have another question though.
I now have a 1GB disk that is not initialised.
See screenshot:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/fvl3h92dqbf5w ... .57.20.png
Is that correct? Can it be removed?
read the bottom part of my tutorial it's the VMDK file once again, best bet would be to convert to a read only format but i haven't the time currently.
-
Thanks to your guide I have installed a new VM with Nanoboot and original 4482 pat file. :D
Your tip to delete the vmdk and re-upload when the install does not reboot, did the trick for me!!
Thanks mate!
Great, From what i can tell thats due DSM installing it self over the VMDK file. So close to beating my visitor count on my website
-
Yes, he could have just sent you a PM instead...
But well... Never mind!
i believe it was for me atleast, it makes sense since he posted it in all the same places i did
Can we use any other PAT file or must be DSM_DS3612xs_4482.pat?Possible to use DSM from other hardware, like DS412+ (DSM_DS412+_4482.pat) or DS413 (DSM_DS413_4482.pat) ?
Thank you,
Alex_G
Why? why would you even want to?
-
Ill stick to GnoBoot I feel safe with what he is putting out.
in my opinion gnoboot is dead, no activity from him in a while, nanoboot is faster and is based on 5.0 source so better... but its ofcourse up to you xD but since you commented on my site im guessing your tempted haha xD
-
Nanoboot worked fine on my VirtualBox test instances
Used VBoxManage to create .vdi from .img
VBoxManage convertfromraw -format VDI NanoBoot-5.0.2.1-fat.img NanoBoot-5.0.2.1-fat.vdi
or just use the provided vmdk file? or doesn't vmdk work on virtualbox?
-
LOL
he literally wrote that in like 4 different posts.... some people....... no comment.... moving on... nothing to see here... RAGE!
-
nanoboot run with not modified pat file
you can use legacy DSM_DS3612xs_4482.pat
spam much? MY GUIDE IS UPDATED, SORRY BUT I CANT READ F***KING CHINESE/JAPANESE SO DIDN'T KNOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
nanoboot run with not modified pat file
you can use legacy DSM_DS3612xs_4482.pat
ok no need to cry like a little baby about it... aka large and red text. geez. i didn't even know that cuz i dont read fricken chinese/japanese
-
Im in the situation that i have a HP MediaSmart Server EX 490 with upgraded CPU. For those of you who don't know the box it's a small server holding up to 4 drives. It is born with Windows Home Server, but that software isn't for me, since I find it very resource heavy. There is no display port and therefore I'm not able to connect a monitor.
I managed to install the Xpenology DSM 4.2 build on it and it has been working great for a long time now, but the last couple of days the Resource monitor tells me that a task named LIBC5 is using 49% cpu (and there is 2 of them) so my fan is completely fucked.
Now for the question:
Is there a way to install DSM 5.0 (4482) with or without nanoboot/gnoboot when I'm not able to connect a monitor. For me it seems like the guides for both gnoboot and nanoboot requires a monitor. Anyone who could clarify this or perhaps have some idea's on how to install the DSM software?
Essentially you could just press down and enter and guess the key combination or ofcourse the better idea is to use ESXi since that is managed remotely from another system, hence why many are using it with headless severs Either way i have guides on how to install gnoboot on both esxi and without and nanoboot, they technically require a monitor but it's essentially down enter or down down enter just look at the pictures , my tutorials can be found
-
Someone put all the packages from SynoCommunity online for every architecture:
Nice saves me needing to build them haha xD
-
Yeah i also have some spk's compiled, i can compile any you want just send me a message on here/or cyanlabs facebook/twitter/g+
-
Unfortunally nanoboot don't work on my Readynas Pro 2 so I must stay for gnoboot kernel.
Does not work on vmware esxi for me also (no disk detected)
follow my guide it works fine. http://cyanlabs.co.uk/tutorials/synolog ... o-nanoboot
MAKE SURE TO FOLLOW IT EXACTLY
-
I think I will wait for gnoBoot to do his magic as everything works on my N54L.
Agreed
nanoboot works fine as a drop in replacement - viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3068 < -- my new guide
-
-
UPDATING FROM GNOBOOT TO NANOBOOT - http://cyanlabs.co.uk/tutorials/synolog ... o-nanoboot
NO DATA WAS LOST DURING THE UPDATE, BUT BACKUP!
EDIT: yes it's a link to my site, it's easier to maintain, update and manage. Feel free to leave comments as a reply here or on my site, my site will prob be responded to quicker since i get almost instant notifications.
-
Hehehe!
Just finished mine. Going to entertain the kids now.
Speak to you later. Cheers
Btw do you use multiple virtual sockets for XPEnology in ESXi?
Of multiple v-cores?
you meant this right?
i use cores never experimented with v sockets though.
gnoboot & DSM 5.0-4482 - Experiences?
in AMD
Posted
Thanks, Glad it helped