Jump to content
XPEnology Community

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'e1000'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Information
    • Readers News & Rumours
    • Information and Feedback
    • The Noob Lounge
  • XPEnology Project
    • F.A.Q - START HERE
    • Loader Releases & Extras
    • DSM Updates Reporting
    • Developer Discussion Room
    • Tutorials and Guides
    • DSM Installation
    • DSM Post-Installation
    • Packages & DSM Features
    • General Questions
    • Hardware Modding
    • Software Modding
    • Miscellaneous
  • International
    • РУССКИЙ
    • FRANÇAIS
    • GERMAN
    • SPANISH
    • ITALIAN
    • KOREAN

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


About Me

Found 2 results

  1. Motherboard: HP Z240 SFF Workstation and 2nd HP800G1 CPU: corei5 and core i7 6th gen NIC: Both Machines has e1000 Network TCRP v0.9.4.9a DSM model: ds918+ and 3622xs DSM version: 9.2.0-64570 Issue: e1000e driver loaded instead of e1000 TCRP v0.9.4.9a build process end up with "NIc Not found or wrong e1000e extension then failed to build" when try to build any loader it cannot recognize my NIC e1000 and end up with the above error and stops. i did it with 3 machines same error not building any loader 3622xs or ds918+. my all Machines has e1000 NIC. Hope, Pocopico will fix this bug, moreover prior version of TCRP were working properly with DSM 7.1.1
  2. Buenas, tengo un Acer Aspire X3960 con el ultimo loader de Jun y con DSM 6.1.5-15254 update 1, funcionando perfectamente en una red local de 100 mbps. Luego cuando lo traigo a casa, con mi red a Gigabit no hay manera de conectar. Pierde muchos pings y es imposible conectar. Si pongo un cable directo entre el iMac y el DSM funciona perfectamente. En cambio ponerlo en la red local no hay manera. He probado a cambiar la MTU a 1500, a 9000 y no hay forma. El resto de dispositivos de red funciona perfectamente con los dos switches que tengo actualmente. Esto es un ejemplo de perdidas de paquetes PING 192.168.10.224 (192.168.10.224): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 192.168.10.224: icmp_seq=0 ttl=63 time=1.037 ms Request timeout for icmp_seq 1 Request timeout for icmp_seq 2 Request timeout for icmp_seq 3 64 bytes from 192.168.10.224: icmp_seq=4 ttl=63 time=1.055 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.10.224: icmp_seq=5 ttl=63 time=1.226 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.10.224: icmp_seq=6 ttl=63 time=1.237 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.10.224: icmp_seq=7 ttl=63 time=1.246 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.10.224: icmp_seq=8 ttl=63 time=1.128 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.10.224: icmp_seq=9 ttl=63 time=1.285 ms Request timeout for icmp_seq 10 Request timeout for icmp_seq 11 Request timeout for icmp_seq 12 Request timeout for icmp_seq 13 Request timeout for icmp_seq 14 Request timeout for icmp_seq 15 Request timeout for icmp_seq 16 Request timeout for icmp_seq 17 ^C ¿Alguna ideal? Gracias.
×
×
  • Create New...