Jump to content
XPEnology Community

Issue with SMB/CIFS share: loss of connectivity


flegarrec

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I use DSM4.2 (Trantor release).

I recently started to use it for storing all movies and reading them from XBMC on a Windows system via CPL network.

 

I observe strange behavior while reading 1h30 mkv files (with a 10Mb codec).

Twice during the movie, the reading stops.

I observe in the XBMC machine log and on another one that both detect loss of connectivity to the NAS (ping not responding) which several seconds later is coming back.

 

I looked into the NAS log files, and i found at exactly the time of loss (20h56 and 22h08) those lines:

 

Jan 6 20:56:30 smbd: lib/recvfile.c:201 recvfile failed(-1): Broken pipe, count=[32768] total tx/tx=[11564/11564] rwbytes=[11564/11564]

Jan 6 22:08:06 smbd: lib/recvfile.c:201 recvfile failed(-1): Broken pipe, count=[32768] total tx/tx=[10104/10104] rwbytes=[10104/10104]

 

And:

 

smbd/smb2_negprot.c:238: [2014/01/06 22:08:37.003980, syno 0, pid=10358] smbd_smb2_request_process_negprot (smbd/smb2_negprot.c:238) port [445], nbt_port: [139]

smbd/smb2_negprot.c:230: [2014/01/06 22:09:16.969594, syno 0, pid=10360] smbd_smb2_request_process_negprot (smbd/smb2_negprot.c:230) protocol[7], max_read: [1048576], max_write: [1048576]

smbd/smb2_negprot.c:238: [2014/01/06 22:09:16.969808, syno 0, pid=10360] smbd_smb2_request_process_negprot (smbd/smb2_negprot.c:238) port [445], nbt_port: [139]

 

I checked that port 445 corresponds to Windows usage of the SMB share.

Any idea about the reason why i get those?

Do i need to upgrade to DSM 4.3 to get rid of it?

 

Thanks in advance for your help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, i tried yesterday. The moment i uncheck the box in synology i totally lose the share and can not access it anymore from my windows boxes. So i left it checked.

However, i saw that i had a backup of several GB archives launched automatically towards the NAS, in parallel of trying to read the mkv files. I guess it might have been too much for it to sustain. I will try de-activate the backup, and if it works, i will activate it again with lower allocated bandwidth.

 

Anyway, i did not know the SMB2 large MTU thing, thanks for this idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
×
×
  • Create New...