vinhnguyen Posted December 31, 2022 Share #1601 Posted December 31, 2022 On 12/30/2022 at 2:18 AM, idaanx said: If you do this make sure you have an idea what you are doing, there is always a risk of losing data if something goes wrong. modprobe acpi-cpufreq && echo "performance" | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor With my DVA3221 using i5-11400 there is no change in score after running the above command. Scores are at the same threshold as i5-11400 on geekbench.com. https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/19608551 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
idaanx Posted December 31, 2022 Share #1602 Posted December 31, 2022 7 minutes ago, vinhnguyen said: With my DVA3221 using i5-11400 there is no change in score after running the above command. Scores are at the same threshold as i5-11400 on geekbench.com. https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/19608551 Newer Intel CPUs don't seem to be effected by the acpi-cpufreq module and work perfectly without it. Same for my i3-6100T, maybe Skylake is the cutoff since Haswell still had the issue. Thanks for testing. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemesis122 Posted December 31, 2022 Share #1603 Posted December 31, 2022 (edited) Consumption in this case go every time with this High Freq enabled because Idle is the same consumption and much more power xeon 1240v2 gen8 Microserver 4x6tb raid 0 16Gb RAM with high freq idle 52 watt full 94 watt score 784 Single-Core Score 3238 Multi-Core Score xeon 1240v2 without freq idle 54 watt full 68 watt score 373 Single-Core Score 1659 Multi-Core Score Edited December 31, 2022 by nemesis122 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
idaanx Posted December 31, 2022 Share #1604 Posted December 31, 2022 2 hours ago, nemesis122 said: Consumption in this case go every time with this High Freq enabled because Idle is the same consumption and much more power xeon 1240v2 gen8 Microserver 4x6tb raid 0 16Gb RAM with high freq idle 52 watt full 94 watt score 784 Single-Core Score 3238 Multi-Core Score xeon 1240v2 without freq idle 54 watt full 68 watt score 373 Single-Core Score 1659 Multi-Core Score So the with high freq is with the governor set to performance and the without freq is the default without it set or did you set something yourself? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
idaanx Posted December 31, 2022 Share #1605 Posted December 31, 2022 On 12/29/2022 at 2:48 PM, nemesis122 said: hi 3615 is running great but there is a little cosmetic also after cpu info do you know how to fix that ? ty That is the frequency set in the first part of ARPL. I have this too, it's just cosmatic. Once the acpi-cpufreq is loaded this isn't an issue. Tested this by setting the configurator to userspace with 1120000 and as you can see it worked. But not useful in normal use, needs to be changed in kernel of the loader. The CPU and cores are baked in the pat of the model but looks like you changed it with the this tool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruffpl Posted December 31, 2022 Share #1606 Posted December 31, 2022 Hello. I am doing first test moving from Redpill and DS918 to ARPL. I got couple questions. I am testing DS3622 with LSI 9200-8i IT mode in Proxmox. I wrote SataPortMap=118 DiskIdxMap=100A00 and my 5 hdds connected to controller are as I wanted number from 3 to 7. Virtual sata drive shows up as number 11. Any idea to get it as number 1 (and 2 as Loader)? I got intel 8500T cpu- is it possible to get transcoding if it is not DS with Celeron J cpu (with f.ex synocodectool-patch), or I need to try with DS920? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemesis122 Posted December 31, 2022 Share #1607 Posted December 31, 2022 (edited) 2 hours ago, idaanx said: So the with high freq is with the governor set to performance and the without freq is the default without it set or did you set something yourself? Hi Yes exactly only this command by boot in the taskplaner switched off testing / swiched on Reboot Testing modprobe acpi-cpufreq && echo "performance" | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor Edited December 31, 2022 by nemesis122 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemesis122 Posted December 31, 2022 Share #1608 Posted December 31, 2022 (edited) I have already changed with cpu info but the cpu clock is still false with 3615 anyway i have switched back to 3622xs (and then the cpu info is correct)with the cpu governeur command in the task High Freq and is running great. @idaanx why do you use 3615xs ? thank you for your feedback. Edited December 31, 2022 by nemesis122 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
techno89 Posted December 31, 2022 Share #1609 Posted December 31, 2022 Just wanted to get everyones input here. Thinking ahead to when this flash drive that my loader is on dies, because obviously it will, would it be wise to, or can I create a carbon copy clone of this flash drive on another as a working backup so that if the flash drive dies I can just pop in the backup? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
idaanx Posted December 31, 2022 Share #1610 Posted December 31, 2022 5 minutes ago, techno89 said: Just wanted to get everyones input here. Thinking ahead to when this flash drive that my loader is on dies, because obviously it will, would it be wise to, or can I create a carbon copy clone of this flash drive on another as a working backup so that if the flash drive dies I can just pop in the backup? The flash drive is only used on boot and when you're configuring the loader, wouldn't worry too much of breaking it. Make a note of your model, build, serial, mac and anything else you might have changed just in case. And when it breaks just create a fresh one with your details. You should also be able to just plug the drive into your computer and copy the user-config.yml file with the settings, take a note of the ARPL version in that case. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hiritsuki Posted January 1, 2023 Share #1611 Posted January 1, 2023 Hi i have problem... When i use only 1 hdd to install is ok But 3hdd even hdd is no data It's can't to boot My hardware is 10700K E500 G6 (w480) DDR4 16G*2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
idaanx Posted January 2, 2023 Share #1612 Posted January 2, 2023 21 hours ago, hiritsuki said: When i use only 1 hdd to install is ok But 3hdd even hdd is no data It's can't to boot You're not the first, please read the first post here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dreadnought Posted January 2, 2023 Share #1613 Posted January 2, 2023 (edited) @idaanx when I execute the command modprobe acpi-cpufreq && echo "performance" | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor I get the following error on my ARPL system: modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'acpi_cpufreq': No such device Any idea how to fix? Here is my benchmark before switching the governor: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/19655399 Edited January 2, 2023 by Dreadnought Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
idaanx Posted January 2, 2023 Share #1614 Posted January 2, 2023 (edited) 24 minutes ago, Dreadnought said: @idaanx when I execute the command modprobe acpi-cpufreq && echo "performance" | tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor I get the following error on my ARPL system: modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'acpi_cpufreq': No such device Any idea how to fix? Here is my benchmark before switching the governor: https://browser.geekbench.com/processors/intel-core-i7-4960hq I've seen that error before, can't remember in what situation. Need some more info. What model do you use? The benchmark link you provided is the general score for your CPU not your own score. Link looks like browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/<numbers>, take a look in your browser history for the correct one. Baremetal or VM? Edited January 2, 2023 by idaanx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dreadnought Posted January 2, 2023 Share #1615 Posted January 2, 2023 16 minutes ago, idaanx said: I've seen that error before, can't remember in what situation. Need some more info. What model do you use? The benchmark link you provided is the general score for your CPU not your own score. Link looks like browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/<numbers>, take a look in your browser history for the correct one. Baremetal or VM? I fixed the link in the meantime. This is my test system working within a Parallels VM. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
idaanx Posted January 2, 2023 Share #1616 Posted January 2, 2023 On 12/31/2022 at 4:54 PM, nemesis122 said: I have already changed with cpu info but the cpu clock is still false with 3615 anyway i have switched back to 3622xs (and then the cpu info is correct)with the cpu governeur command in the task High Freq and is running great. @idaanx why do you use 3615xs ? thank you for your feedback. 3615xs is the only one which works without the fix, and since I didn't know who to fix it yet I switch back to it. But I wouldn't recommend downgrading to the 3615xs, a lot of hassle because the DSM settings will be lost. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dreadnought Posted January 2, 2023 Share #1617 Posted January 2, 2023 6 minutes ago, idaanx said: 3615xs is the only one which works without the fix, and since I didn't know who to fix it yet I switch back to it. But I wouldn't recommend downgrading to the 3615xs, a lot of hassle because the DSM settings will be lost. I am on 3622xs. I will try it on my real NAS maybe with another result. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
idaanx Posted January 2, 2023 Share #1618 Posted January 2, 2023 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Dreadnought said: I fixed the link in the meantime. This is my test system working within a Parallels VM. That explains the error. The future is not supported in a VM since the host OS manages the CPU scaling. Your score looks good with only 2 cores in the VM, single is a bit less because of the overhead of the VM and it's a laptop guessing by the CPU. Edited January 2, 2023 by idaanx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
idaanx Posted January 2, 2023 Share #1619 Posted January 2, 2023 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Dreadnought said: I am on 3622xs. I will try it on my real NAS maybe with another result. Please don't! Like I said it just messes up your settings, and at the time I didn't know how else to fix the performance yet. Just run the performance command on your NAS, if you have low Geekbench scores on it. It should work on this CPU, if it doesn't a reboot will put it back to normal. Edited January 2, 2023 by idaanx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dreadnought Posted January 2, 2023 Share #1620 Posted January 2, 2023 1 minute ago, idaanx said: Please don't! Like I said it just messes up your settings, and at the time I didn't know how to fix it yet. Just run the performance command on your NAS, if you have low Geekbench scores on it. It should work on this CPU, if it doesn't a reboot will put it back to normal. My test system is a 9 years old macbook. I have 2 NAS systems. One is for testing and one with the real data. So I try it on my real testsystem. If something is messed up there, it doesn't matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dreadnought Posted January 2, 2023 Share #1621 Posted January 2, 2023 (edited) 20 minutes ago, Dreadnought said: My test system is a 9 years old macbook. I have 2 NAS systems. One is for testing and one with the real data. So I try it on my real testsystem. If something is messed up there, it doesn't matter. here the results of my real test NAS before the governor change: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/19656573 Edited January 2, 2023 by Dreadnought Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dreadnought Posted January 2, 2023 Share #1622 Posted January 2, 2023 Just now, Dreadnought said: here the results of my real test NAS before the governor change: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/19656573 hm ok and there will be no after because the some error message as above: modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'acpi_cpufreq': No such device modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'acpi_cpufreq': No such device Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fbelavenuto Posted January 2, 2023 Author Share #1623 Posted January 2, 2023 Guys, please do a test who has an HP microserver and who has a performance problem: Activate "Direct Boot" within the "Advanced menu". Just active and boot, is not necessary to rebuild the loader. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
idaanx Posted January 2, 2023 Share #1624 Posted January 2, 2023 2 minutes ago, Dreadnought said: hm ok and there will be no after because the some error message as above: modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'acpi_cpufreq': No such device modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'acpi_cpufreq': No such device This CPU doesn't support the needed scaling, just checked its features. So you're good. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
idaanx Posted January 2, 2023 Share #1625 Posted January 2, 2023 26 minutes ago, fbelavenuto said: Guys, please do a test who has an HP microserver and who has a performance problem: Activate "Direct Boot" within the "Advanced menu". Just active and boot, is not necessary to rebuild the loader. Just tested this, had to do a clean install again (was testing something with Jun and DSM 6.2 before). It is faster than before and a lot of people will think this fixes things. But I can tell you with certainty, it is still not fixed, it's basically the same as TCRP. The /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/ directory is still empty so the acpi-cpufreq is still not loaded. Resulting in the base frequency for my CPU instead of the full performance, just like TCRP. Like I said before in my detailed issue analysis, it is a flawed test in the misc add-on, this needs to be fixed. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.