pocopico Posted August 10, 2022 Share #1 Posted August 10, 2022 (edited) Release 7.1.1. is out and based on some quick research of the pat files, the update should be possible. Until all aspects of the upgrade are covered, please hold your upgrades to 7.1.1 RC https://www.synology.com/en-us/releaseNote/DSM?model=DS3622xs%2B#7_1 @fbelavenuto @jumkey@yanjun@Peter Suh @Orphée Facts so far : - The PAT file can be extracted using the same procedure. - The modules version are the same - The kernel version is still the same - File structure looks the same Edited August 10, 2022 by pocopico 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Suh Posted August 10, 2022 Share #2 Posted August 10, 2022 DS1621+ was selected as a sample model and TCRP, jun mode, and 7.1.1 RC update were performed. There seems to be nothing wrong with it. The jot mode seems to work well too. Let's try it further. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fbelavenuto Posted August 10, 2022 Share #3 Posted August 10, 2022 Several people are updating ARPL to this new release. I wanted to take the opportunity to give a message for users: Before upgrading to a new release or a new smallupdate, wait for testing information on the forum, as a new release can have a lot of changes and break your installation. This is the reason for not leaving automatic update by default. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pigr8 Posted August 10, 2022 Share #4 Posted August 10, 2022 tested on a test vm with ARPL 0.3a8 DS920+ build, install seems to work, ramdisk patch misses the new build but it seems that should work when added the correct version. avoid RC version for production. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aigor Posted August 10, 2022 Share #5 Posted August 10, 2022 ISC dhcp? it seems DHCP is DNSMASQ and not DSC. Why they don't implement auto update dns zone from dhcp? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orphée Posted August 10, 2022 Share #6 Posted August 10, 2022 This vulnerability fix list is heavy... this update will be a must. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Suh Posted August 10, 2022 Share #7 Posted August 10, 2022 13 minutes ago, Orphée said: This vulnerability fix list is heavy... this update will be a must. It seems that there are users who skip RC and wait for the official release. By the way, it took more than a month from the last 7.1.0-42621 RC version to the official version. If we wait for this period, there is a risk that we may be exposed to vulnerabilities for a long time, so we are deeply concerned. Is there any chance that this vulnerability will be corrected with 7.1.0-42661 update 5? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlozo Posted August 10, 2022 Share #8 Posted August 10, 2022 (edited) why in this model the status is your DSM version is UP-TO-DATE but iin DS3622xs or DS920 is in red telling error on the status Edited August 10, 2022 by carlozo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlozo Posted August 10, 2022 Share #9 Posted August 10, 2022 cant you fix the DS3622 and DS920 so be the same status like DS1621 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Suh Posted August 10, 2022 Share #10 Posted August 10, 2022 (edited) 4 hours ago, Peter Suh said: DS1621+ was selected as a sample model and TCRP, jun mode, and 7.1.1 RC update were performed. There seems to be nothing wrong with it. The jot mode seems to work well too. Let's try it further. 7.1.1 RC was immediately used when requesting a DSM pat file in DS3622xs+ jot mode built with m shell. I immediately entered TC Linux and processed postupdate. By the way, the PC shut down after a few seconds of nic response on reboot. Edited August 10, 2022 by Peter Suh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fbelavenuto Posted August 10, 2022 Share #11 Posted August 10, 2022 ARPL updated for new buildnumber: https://github.com/fbelavenuto/arpl/releases/tag/v0.4-alpha1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phone guy Posted August 10, 2022 Share #12 Posted August 10, 2022 I personally never use RC's of any software, operating systems, nas os, mobile os, nothing. When a build hits the RC stage, its not long before the actual release comes along, and in my opinion, its better to wait for the actual release. Plus it will be easier in the long run for users to upgrade from a current released version of DSM to another released version of DSM. My advice to all is skip the RC and wait for the official release and the magic will happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyride Posted August 10, 2022 Share #13 Posted August 10, 2022 5 hours ago, Peter Suh said: If we wait for this period, there is a risk that we may be exposed to vulnerabilities for a long time, so we are deeply concerned. Even with a real Synology, they are so far behind the industry on critical vulnerabilities that it should override any underlying urgency associated with patch timing. Anyone who is serious about security and is also making DSM accessible to the Internet should be doing so via VPN, a third-party authenticated proxy, or better yet, not at all. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pocopico Posted August 10, 2022 Author Share #14 Posted August 10, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, flyride said: Even with a real Synology, they are so far behind the industry on critical vulnerabilities that it should override any underlying urgency associated with patch timing. Anyone who is serious about security and is also making DSM accessible to the Internet should be doing so via VPN, a third-party authenticated proxy, or better yet, not at all. I couldn’t agree more !!! Do not expose your precious data through known ports or protocols on internet. Use VPN and only if there is no other option, open ports to your server but, never expose more than one service per system and if you do, never use standard ports if possible Edited August 10, 2022 by pocopico 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orphée Posted August 10, 2022 Share #15 Posted August 10, 2022 Traefik + authelia is a good start if vpn is not an option. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vinhnguyen Posted August 11, 2022 Share #16 Posted August 11, 2022 I have an error with DSM 7.1.1RC DS3622xs+. Using sudo ./rploader.sh postupdate broadwellnk-7.1.0-42661 successfully. But accessing the IP address of the NAS, the system automatically shuts down. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Suh Posted August 11, 2022 Share #17 Posted August 11, 2022 2 minutes ago, vinhnguyen said: I have an error with DSM 7.1.1RC DS3622xs+. Using sudo ./rploader.sh postupdate broadwellnk-7.1.0-42661 successfully. But accessing the IP address of the NAS, the system automatically shuts down. Your report is exactly the same as mine. I think it will be a good reference. thank you 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apriliars3 Posted August 11, 2022 Share #18 Posted August 11, 2022 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fbelavenuto Posted August 11, 2022 Share #19 Posted August 11, 2022 9 hours ago, apriliars3 said: I need to modify the code, it was for the loader not to start in case of an error in the patches! 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pocopico Posted August 11, 2022 Author Share #20 Posted August 11, 2022 The 7.1.1-42951 build has been tested with TCRP on platform DS3622. The extensions have been updated and a new loader has been created from scratch using TCRP. 6 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hiukong Posted September 2, 2022 Share #21 Posted September 2, 2022 Hi @pocopico, I got stuck at upgrading my DS918+ from 7.1.0-42661 to 7.1.1-42951 RC. It's in infinite loop of Recover mode. Tried to start TCRP and do the postupdate with "./rploader.sh postupdate apollolake-7.1.0-42661". I was prompted if I wanted to use apollolake-7.1.1-42951 and I entered "y". After rebooting it got worse: visit the NAS via browser gave me "Err_connection_refused". Could you please tell me what I should do? I could reinstall DSM but couldn't SSH/Telnet to the box so no way for me to reset that. Thanks in advance!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeorgeLondon Posted September 2, 2022 Share #22 Posted September 2, 2022 Hiukong, the way i solved this issue was to recreate a usb stick from scratch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Suh Posted September 3, 2022 Share #23 Posted September 3, 2022 (edited) 17 hours ago, hiukong said: Hi @pocopico, I got stuck at upgrading my DS918+ from 7.1.0-42661 to 7.1.1-42951 RC. It's in infinite loop of Recover mode. Tried to start TCRP and do the postupdate with "./rploader.sh postupdate apollolake-7.1.0-42661". I was prompted if I wanted to use apollolake-7.1.1-42951 and I entered "y". After rebooting it got worse: visit the NAS via browser gave me "Err_connection_refused". Could you please tell me what I should do? I could reinstall DSM but couldn't SSH/Telnet to the box so no way for me to reset that. Thanks in advance!! Updates to 7.1.0-42951 RC must use pocopico's develop repo. https://github.com/pocopico/tinycore-redpill/tree/develop You should have used pocopico's main(master) repo. https://github.com/pocopico/tinycore-redpill/tree/main You can record the img file of develop back to the USB stick, but You can convert it to the contents of the develop repo in the following way. curl --location "https://github.com/pocopico/tinycore-redpill/raw/develop/rploader.sh" -O chmod +x rploader.sh ./rploader.sh fullupgrade Edited September 3, 2022 by Peter Suh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hiukong Posted September 3, 2022 Share #24 Posted September 3, 2022 7 hours ago, GeorgeLondon said: Hiukong, the way i solved this issue was to recreate a usb stick from scratch. Thank you, George! Let me try. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hiukong Posted September 3, 2022 Share #25 Posted September 3, 2022 12 minutes ago, Peter Suh said: Updates to 7.1.0-42951 RC must use pocopico's develop repo. https://github.com/pocopico/tinycore-redpill/tree/develop You should have used pocopico's main(master) repo. https://github.com/pocopico/tinycore-redpill/tree/main You can record the img file of develop back to the USB stick, but You can convert it to the contents of the develop repo in the following way. curl --location "https://github.com/pocopico/tinycore-redpill/raw/develop/rploader.sh" -O chmod +x rploader.sh ./rploader.sh fullupgrade Appreciate the detailed instructions, Peter! Working on it now. Will share the result here soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts