lastkiss Posted March 14, 2017 Share #2276 Posted March 14, 2017 My NASDS3615xs 6.0.2 Jun's Mod V1.01 MB:J4205-ITX RAM:KST 4G*2(1.35v) Marvell 9215*1 PCIE 1X HD:ST8000AS0002-1NA17Z*2 in Marvell 9215 SSD:x25-E*2 (SSD Cache) When SSD cache enabled Hard disk read speed is very slow(50-55M/s), write ok(100M/s) ASM1061 or Marvell 9215 will be so,very slow Who can help me? Thank you for everyone Do you have this problem? DS3615xs 6.0.2 Jun's Mod V1.01 -------------------------- set common_args_3615='syno_hdd_powerup_seq=0 HddHotplug=0 syno_hw_version=DS3615xs vender_format_version=2 console=ttyS0,115200n8 withefi elevator=elevator quiet' set sata_args='sata_uid=1 sata_pcislot=5 synoboot_satadom=1 DiskIdxMap=0C SataPortMap=44 SasIdxMap=0' So now is it the SSD cache, or the portmap setup? How to do it ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black6spdZ Posted March 14, 2017 Share #2277 Posted March 14, 2017 My NASDS3615xs 6.0.2 Jun's Mod V1.01 MB:J4205-ITX RAM:KST 4G*2(1.35v) Marvell 9215*1 PCIE 1X HD:ST8000AS0002-1NA17Z*2 in Marvell 9215 SSD:x25-E*2 (SSD Cache) When SSD cache enabled Hard disk read speed is very slow(50-55M/s), write ok(100M/s) ASM1061 or Marvell 9215 will be so,very slow Who can help me? Thank you for everyone Do you have this problem? DS3615xs 6.0.2 Jun's Mod V1.01 -------------------------- set common_args_3615='syno_hdd_powerup_seq=0 HddHotplug=0 syno_hw_version=DS3615xs vender_format_version=2 console=ttyS0,115200n8 withefi elevator=elevator quiet' set sata_args='sata_uid=1 sata_pcislot=5 synoboot_satadom=1 DiskIdxMap=0C SataPortMap=44 SasIdxMap=0' So you have 2x HDD and 2x SSD correct? Why not use all 4 onboard SATA ports? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lastkiss Posted March 14, 2017 Share #2278 Posted March 14, 2017 My NASDS3615xs 6.0.2 Jun's Mod V1.01 MB:J4205-ITX RAM:KST 4G*2(1.35v) Marvell 9215*1 PCIE 1X HD:ST8000AS0002-1NA17Z*2 in Marvell 9215 SSD:x25-E*2 (SSD Cache) When SSD cache enabled Hard disk read speed is very slow(50-55M/s), write ok(100M/s) ASM1061 or Marvell 9215 will be so,very slow Who can help me? Thank you for everyone Do you have this problem? DS3615xs 6.0.2 Jun's Mod V1.01 -------------------------- set common_args_3615='syno_hdd_powerup_seq=0 HddHotplug=0 syno_hw_version=DS3615xs vender_format_version=2 console=ttyS0,115200n8 withefi elevator=elevator quiet' set sata_args='sata_uid=1 sata_pcislot=5 synoboot_satadom=1 DiskIdxMap=0C SataPortMap=44 SasIdxMap=0' So you have 2x HDD and 2x SSD correct? Why not use all 4 onboard SATA ports? yes,I tried it use all 4 onboard The problem still exists Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hostilian Posted March 14, 2017 Share #2279 Posted March 14, 2017 My NASDS3615xs 6.0.2 Jun's Mod V1.01 MB:J4205-ITX RAM:KST 4G*2(1.35v) Marvell 9215*1 PCIE 1X HD:ST8000AS0002-1NA17Z*2 in Marvell 9215 SSD:x25-E*2 (SSD Cache) When SSD cache enabled Hard disk read speed is very slow(50-55M/s), write ok(100M/s) ASM1061 or Marvell 9215 will be so,very slow yes,I tried it use all 4 onboard The problem still exists What speeds are you getting when SSD cache is turned off? I think PCIE x1 is limited to 500MB/s (assuming PCIE 2.0), which would be shared by all devices plugged into this Interface.. No idea what the overhead is but I'd be inclined to make sure the SSDs are plugged into your motherboard, where they can make full use of the SATA3 interfaces (600MB/sec each).. In fact, given the speed of PCIE x1, I probably wouldn't use it at all.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lastkiss Posted March 15, 2017 Share #2280 Posted March 15, 2017 What speeds are you getting when SSD cache is turned off? I think PCIE x1 is limited to 500MB/s (assuming PCIE 2.0), which would be shared by all devices plugged into this Interface.. No idea what the overhead is but I'd be inclined to make sure the SSDs are plugged into your motherboard, where they can make full use of the SATA3 interfaces (600MB/sec each).. In fact, given the speed of PCIE x1, I probably wouldn't use it at all.. SSD cache is turned off Speed The speed is ok, are close to 100MB thank you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neonflx Posted March 15, 2017 Share #2281 Posted March 15, 2017 Updated to 6.1 using Alpha loader without any issues, no weird messages and everything works ok. Bare Metal, LSI 9211-8 on ASROCK board Xeon CPU 8 3tb, didn't loose any data. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polanskiman Posted March 15, 2017 Share #2282 Posted March 15, 2017 Updated to 6.1 using Alpha loader without any issues, no weird messages and everything works ok. Bare Metal, LSI 9211-8 on ASROCK board Xeon CPU 8 3tb, didn't loose any data. Just wait a day or two and then report again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wkweksl Posted March 15, 2017 Share #2283 Posted March 15, 2017 Looks like the DSM 6.1 GPL sources are currently being added https://sourceforge.net/projects/dsgpl/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polanskiman Posted March 15, 2017 Share #2284 Posted March 15, 2017 Looks like the DSM 6.1 GPL sources are currently being added https://sourceforge.net/projects/dsgpl/ Indeed. As we speak! Not sure all the source code is included though looking at the size of the source. We shall wait they finish the uploads. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nowy1 Posted March 15, 2017 Share #2285 Posted March 15, 2017 Hello, I loader DS3615xs 6.1 Jun's Mod V1.02-alpha have a problem logging in to support quickconnec change my MAC address and serial number on hand http://quickconnector.orgfree.com/index.php gets Daka information The system could not perform any operation, an unknown error occurred What may be the problem ? DSM DSM is 6.1-15047 Update 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matlow Posted March 15, 2017 Share #2286 Posted March 15, 2017 Hello, I have problem. I want upgrade to dsm 6.0 but Synology Assistance don't find my xpenology. I have asrock ion 330 ( amcp7a ion-ht ) and bootloader Jun's official v.1.01. Bootloader is working. xpenoboot for 5.2 working fine. Any1 can help me? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fonix232 Posted March 15, 2017 Share #2287 Posted March 15, 2017 Looks like the DSM 6.1 GPL sources are currently being added https://sourceforge.net/projects/dsgpl/ Indeed. As we speak! Not sure all the source code is included though looking at the size of the source. We shall wait they finish the uploads. Apparently they're done. As far as I see, all the sources we need are available. Synology also made a Docker/KVM package/image available, so I was thinking, maybe it would be possible to use a baseline Linux distro with Docker/KVM, and run it inside that? That way most of the hackery to get around their security wouldn't be needed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schnapps Posted March 15, 2017 Share #2288 Posted March 15, 2017 Looks like the DSM 6.1 GPL sources are currently being added https://sourceforge.net/projects/dsgpl/ Indeed. As we speak! Not sure all the source code is included though looking at the size of the source. We shall wait they finish the uploads. Apparently they're done. As far as I see, all the sources we need are available. Synology also made a Docker/KVM package/image available, so I was thinking, maybe it would be possible to use a baseline Linux distro with Docker/KVM, and run it inside that? That way most of the hackery to get around their security wouldn't be needed. That would rock, but I guess they locked it to run only on DSM. Need some Elder Geek to check if it's doable Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitaro Posted March 15, 2017 Share #2289 Posted March 15, 2017 Hi, everybody! At the people the generated SN disappear in a private office of Synology. I have also all SN that I got in case of tests 6.1 – names of models were gone though SN remained, but it is impossible to delete them, an error message is given: validation.serial_no Inquiry: for whom works stablly 6.1 – didn't include QC? And everything was disconnected at those who connected it? It seems us well gave a ride with 6.1! The freebie ended. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black6spdZ Posted March 16, 2017 Share #2290 Posted March 16, 2017 so non-intel CPU / NIC = hit-or-miss bare-metal 6.1 NAS it appears. performance wise I'm not sure who would deviate from this anyway Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan1j3l Posted March 16, 2017 Share #2291 Posted March 16, 2017 Hi, I'm trying to make synology bootable image with jun's scripts from github and newly released syno source, but I'm missing compatibility util source (error while mkramdisk is trying to compile from tool directory which is empty). What is it and where can I download it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aigor Posted March 16, 2017 Share #2292 Posted March 16, 2017 Hi, I'm trying to make synology bootable image with jun's scripts from github and newly released syno source, but I'm missing compatibility util source (error while mkramdisk is trying to compile from tool directory which is empty). What is it and where can I download it. It seems that it need modprobe into tool folder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PnP Posted March 16, 2017 Share #2293 Posted March 16, 2017 Sorry I have hp gen 8 and before update to 6.1 work all good with loader 1.01... i update to new loader and update to 6.1 but when reset hp and restart loader default cannot find in lan... is there a fix? .. is it possible to downgrade to 6.02? .. thanks edit. resolve with clean install without delete data.. thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sze Posted March 16, 2017 Share #2294 Posted March 16, 2017 Hi, running under vm 6.5 and try loader 1.02a for ds3617. After one day get that f++k page "Sorry, the page you are looking for is not found.". Now I will try loader for ds3615. Read some posts that that image don't have this kind of problem. Is there any other different between these 2 images. Is there a pro to use ds3617 if its working? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black6spdZ Posted March 16, 2017 Share #2295 Posted March 16, 2017 Hi,running under vm 6.5 and try loader 1.02a for ds3617. After one day get that f++k page "Sorry, the page you are looking for is not found.". Now I will try loader for ds3615. Read some posts that that image don't have this kind of problem. Is there any other different between these 2 images. Is there a pro to use ds3617 if its working? besides bragging rights that 3617 > 3615, from everything I've read 3615 doesn't limit usable hardware in any way "quad core cpu, more mem etc" most likely the available ad-on Synology packages may differ from the detected hardware version. Someone correct me if I am wrong here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sze Posted March 16, 2017 Share #2296 Posted March 16, 2017 Thanks for feedback. My plan is to put all my drives from a running ds1815+ to the new vm 3615 before 1815+ dies (c2000 cpu problem). Do you see any problems? I have made a backup before if something going wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barrow1990 Posted March 16, 2017 Share #2297 Posted March 16, 2017 Hi All, Great Loader, Ive got an issue on ESXi 6.0. I have a baremetal which im wanting to Migrate to a VM. Ive currently got 2 ASM1062 Sata PCI-E Card in the baremetal but when i pass through the same card on the VM it doesnt seem to detect it inside DSM. Is there anything i need to do on the Grub.cfg to get it to detect it? Baremetal is Running DSM 6.0.2-8451 Update 9 VM Is Successfully running the same Version but unable to detect the passthrough with the 6.0.2 V1.01 Bootloader. VM Is Successfully running the same Version but unable to detect the passthrough with the 6.1 V1.02a Bootloader. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fonix232 Posted March 16, 2017 Share #2298 Posted March 16, 2017 Hi,running under vm 6.5 and try loader 1.02a for ds3617. After one day get that f++k page "Sorry, the page you are looking for is not found.". Now I will try loader for ds3615. Read some posts that that image don't have this kind of problem. Is there any other different between these 2 images. Is there a pro to use ds3617 if its working? besides bragging rights that 3617 > 3615, from everything I've read 3615 doesn't limit usable hardware in any way "quad core cpu, more mem etc" most likely the available ad-on Synology packages may differ from the detected hardware version. Someone correct me if I am wrong here. No, the loaders do not modify the accessible hardware, and the sys info page saying a different CPU is because it's a burnt-in value per model. However the 3615 might not get future updates, while the 3617 will (since it's a newer model). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sze Posted March 16, 2017 Share #2299 Posted March 16, 2017 My Control Panel -> General shows nothing (emty page). All other is working. Is that a normal behavior? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sze Posted March 16, 2017 Share #2300 Posted March 16, 2017 Baremetal is Running DSM 6.0.2-8451 Update 9 VM Is Successfully running the same Version but unable to detect the passthrough with the 6.0.2 V1.01 Bootloader. VM Is Successfully running the same Version but unable to detect the passthrough with the 6.1 V1.02a Bootloader. Think there is no driver for that card. Running also vm with passthrough and this works good. But I use a lsi card. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.