chrisgfx Posted July 3, 2017 Share #3276 Posted July 3, 2017 Hi, I tried to update my Nas but unfortunately I have encountered an issue : the loader 1.02b or 1.01a don't launch the OS! Everything is working well with the Loader 1.01, DS3615xs and DSM 6.0.2-8451 Update 11. And it was the same for every update until now. So there is something different I can't catch with all the notices on this forum! I put the extra package, copy my setup from grub.cfg, tried UEFI or Legacy, but at the best result, I can see loading kernel. And nothing else! Would it be because I'm with the old SHR type ? Thanks for any help! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas1014 Posted July 3, 2017 Share #3277 Posted July 3, 2017 On 29/06/2017 at 8:54 AM, Designator said: The problem for my amd system was that I couldn´t utilitize all of my ram. 30% was always marked as "not usable" by the system. Really annoying. So I switched to an Intel CPU and the amd system is laying aroun unused. I would love to have it as a fallback system. same for me. have you "virtual machine manager" installed ? because but i wonder if it's not this package which eat all the ram. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Designator Posted July 3, 2017 Share #3278 Posted July 3, 2017 2 minutes ago, thomas1014 said: same for me. have you "virtual machine manager" installed ? because but i wonder if it's not this package which eat all the ram. I had the first release of "virtual machine manager" installed on the amd system but the ram usage wasn´t related to the package. Even after uninstalling DSM would not recognize all the installed ram. I haven´t tested it with the latest loader yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ygor Posted July 3, 2017 Share #3279 Posted July 3, 2017 17 minutes ago, Designator said: I had the first release of "virtual machine manager" installed on the amd system but the ram usage wasn´t related to the package. Even after uninstalling DSM would not recognize all the installed ram. I haven´t tested it with the latest loader yet. I have an AMD on HP n54l, 16go of RAM working fine. Dsm 6.02 with juns loader 1.01. was running virtuabbox on dsm with multiple vm win and Linux. I can't find spk of vbox for dsm 6.02 :'( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ygor Posted July 3, 2017 Share #3280 Posted July 3, 2017 was running virtuabbox on dsm with multiple vm win and Linux. With dsm 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas1014 Posted July 3, 2017 Share #3281 Posted July 3, 2017 I had the first release of "virtual machine manager" installed on the amd system but the ram usage wasn´t related to the package. Even after uninstalling DSM would not recognize all the installed ram. I haven´t tested it with the latest loader yet.I'm on 1.02b with an amd 5350 Asus am1i-A with the latest update of ds3617xs 6.1.2.xxxBefore on 1.01a all my ram was recognize. Envoyé de mon SM-G935F en utilisant Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ygor Posted July 3, 2017 Share #3282 Posted July 3, 2017 How did you get this loader :v1.02b (DS3615xs , DS3615xs and DS916+) is for DSM 6.1 - AMD not compatible - Latest version for DSM 6.1 on amd ? When i try find.synology can't find the device Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas1014 Posted July 3, 2017 Share #3283 Posted July 3, 2017 15 minutes ago, ygor said: How did you get this loader :v1.02b (DS3615xs , DS3615xs and DS916+) is for DSM 6.1 - AMD not compatible - Latest version for DSM 6.1 on amd ? When i try find.synology can't find the device i think "(DS3615xs , DS3615xs and DS916+)" it's a mistake and it's rather : "(DS3615xs , DS3617xs and DS916+)" my MB AM1I-A got a Realtek® 8111GR, LAN controler and the driver is included in 1.02b. it works but it's not fully compatible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wxpenology Posted July 3, 2017 Share #3284 Posted July 3, 2017 I have a baremetal install on hp microserver gen8 of DSM 6.0.2 with loader v1.01. I understand that in order to update to DSM 6.1, I would have to backup my data and do a clean install. My data is currently backed up to an external drive using HyperBackup. It is probably silly to ask, but I was hoping to get a quick confo that I will be able to restore from my HyperBackup archive once I have DSM 6.1 up and running? Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas1014 Posted July 3, 2017 Share #3285 Posted July 3, 2017 3 hours ago, ygor said: I have an AMD on HP n54l, 16go of RAM working fine. Dsm 6.02 with juns loader 1.01. was running virtuabbox on dsm with multiple vm win and Linux. I can't find spk of vbox for dsm 6.02 :'( after some research this is what i founed : my bios is at the latest possible update cat /proc/mtrr reg00: base=0x000000000 ( 0MB), size= 2048MB, count=1: write-back reg01: base=0x080000000 ( 2048MB), size= 512MB, count=1: write-back My physical memory is well recognized dmidecode --type memory # dmidecode 2.12 # SMBIOS entry point at 0x000f04c0 SMBIOS 2.7 present. Handle 0x0029, DMI type 16, 23 bytes Physical Memory Array Location: System Board Or Motherboard Use: System Memory Error Correction Type: None Maximum Capacity: 8 GB Error Information Handle: Not Provided Number Of Devices: 2 Handle 0x002B, DMI type 17, 34 bytes Memory Device Array Handle: 0x0029 Error Information Handle: Not Provided Total Width: 64 bits Data Width: 64 bits Size: 4096 MB Form Factor: DIMM Set: None Locator: DIMM_A1 Bank Locator: CHANNEL A Type: DDR3 Type Detail: Synchronous Unbuffered (Unregistered) Speed: 800 MHz Manufacturer: <BAD INDEX> Serial Number: 070704B0 Asset Tag: <BAD INDEX> Part Number: <BAD INDEX> Rank: 1 Configured Clock Speed: 667 MHz Handle 0x002C, DMI type 17, 34 bytes Memory Device Array Handle: 0x0029 Error Information Handle: Not Provided Total Width: 64 bits Data Width: 64 bits Size: 4096 MB Form Factor: DIMM Set: None Locator: DIMM_A2 Bank Locator: CHANNEL A Type: DDR3 Type Detail: Synchronous Unbuffered (Unregistered) Speed: 800 MHz Manufacturer: <BAD INDEX> Serial Number: 070704B0 Asset Tag: <BAD INDEX> Part Number: <BAD INDEX> Rank: 1 Configured Clock Speed: 667 MHz after look into kernel log : Linux version 3.10.102 (root@build3) (gcc version 4. 9.3 20150311 (prerelease) (crosstool-NG 1.20.0) ) #15132 SMP Wed Jun 14 12:26:43 CST 2017 2017-06-20T19:19:52+02:00 berlioz kernel: [ 0.000000] CPU: vendor_id 'AuthenticAMD' unknown, using generic init. 2017-06-20T19:19:52+02:00 berlioz kernel: [ 0.000000] CPU: Your system may be unstable. 2017-06-20T19:19:52+02:00 berlioz kernel: [ 0.000000] efi: mem66: type=4, attr=0xf, range=[0x000000008fea3 000-0x000000008ffe1000) (1MB) 2017-06-20T19:19:52+02:00 berlioz kernel: [ 0.000000] efi: mem67: type=7, attr=0xf, range=[0x000000008ffe1 000-0x000000008ffe2000) (0MB) 2017-06-20T19:19:52+02:00 berlioz kernel: [ 0.000000] WARNING: BIOS bug: CPU MTRRs don't cover all of memo ry, losing 5104MB of RAM. 2017-06-20T19:19:52+02:00 berlioz kernel: [ 0.000000] ------------[ cut here ]------------ 2017-06-20T19:19:52+02:00 berlioz kernel: [ 0.000000] WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/cleanup.c:971 m trr_trim_uncached_memory+0x42d/0x456() 2017-06-20T19:19:52+02:00 berlioz kernel: [ 0.000000] Modules linked in: 2017-06-20T19:19:52+02:00 berlioz kernel: [ 0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 3.10.102 #15 132 2017-06-20T19:19:52+02:00 berlioz kernel: [ 0.000000] Hardware name: ASUS All Series/AM1I-A, BIOS 0801 03/ 10/2016 2017-06-20T19:19:52+02:00 berlioz kernel: [ 0.000000] ffffffff814a8af8 ffffffff81033ee6 00000000000013f0 ffffffff818fd480 2017-06-20T19:19:52+02:00 berlioz kernel: [ 0.000000] 0000000000000000 000000000023f000 ffffffff818fbd00 ffffffff818835b5 2017-06-20T19:19:52+02:00 berlioz kernel: [ 0.000000] 070000000000000c 0000000000080000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 2017-06-20T19:19:52+02:00 berlioz kernel: [ 0.000000] Call Trace: 2017-06-20T19:19:52+02:00 berlioz kernel: [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff814a8af8>] ? dump_stack+0xc/0x15 2017-06-20T19:19:52+02:00 berlioz kernel: [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff81033ee6>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x56/0x 70 2017-06-20T19:19:52+02:00 berlioz kernel: [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff818835b5>] ? mtrr_trim_uncached_memory+0x 42d/0x456 2017-06-20T19:19:52+02:00 berlioz kernel: [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8187e07c>] ? setup_arch+0x555/0xc50 2017-06-20T19:19:52+02:00 berlioz kernel: [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff814a7e6b>] ? printk+0x4a/0x52 2017-06-20T19:19:52+02:00 berlioz kernel: [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff8187a957>] ? start_kernel+0x7b/0x3b0 2017-06-20T19:19:52+02:00 berlioz kernel: [ 0.000000] ---[ end trace 0d92bc4b6dbe0d45 ]--- I will try some kernel/grub options to see if it's better. Interested links : https://comeandtechit.wordpress.com/tag/enable_mtrr_cleanup-mtrr_spare_reg_nr1/ https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=116080 http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/how-to-properly-edit-mtrr-memory-type-range-registers-for-4gb-ram-memory-903691/ https://superuser.com/questions/1055097/mtrrs-do-not-cover-all-16gb-of-memory-on-n3150 http://my-fuzzy-logic.de/blog/index.php?/archives/41-Solving-linux-MTRR-problems.html http://www.oradba.ch/2013/08/avdf-linux-kernel-could-not-recognize-whole-ram/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polanskiman Posted July 4, 2017 Share #3286 Posted July 4, 2017 19 hours ago, thomas1014 said: i think "(DS3615xs , DS3615xs and DS916+)" it's a mistake and it's rather : "(DS3615xs , DS3617xs and DS916+)" Indeed. It's a typo. It has been corrected. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Error404 Posted July 4, 2017 Share #3287 Posted July 4, 2017 (edited) Hi everyone! DSM on my gen8 was updated to 1.02b (DS3617xs). After a day I was not able to load any web page - "Sorry, the page you are looking for is not found." I had reinstalled DSM and everything were working as before. Today I have received the same message again. Edited July 4, 2017 by Error404 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hpk Posted July 4, 2017 Share #3288 Posted July 4, 2017 Can you give some technical informations about your installation? Baremetal or VM? What processor, memory? How did you update to 1.02b? It's difficult to help, if there are so few infos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfarias Posted July 4, 2017 Share #3289 Posted July 4, 2017 Hello. Thanks for the great work.So upgrading from 6.0.2 to 6.1.2 (using the right bootloader) will or not lose the data on the disks? Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toetje583 Posted July 4, 2017 Share #3290 Posted July 4, 2017 Does any one know if Jun is "Still" working on AMD support? Or did anyone had success building a kernel with AMD modules for 6.1.X ? Best Regards, Toetje Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfarias Posted July 4, 2017 Share #3291 Posted July 4, 2017 Does any one know if Jun is "Still" working on AMD support? Or did anyone had success building a kernel with AMD modules for 6.1.X ? Best Regards, ToetjeCheck http://xpenology.com/forum/index.php?/topic/7527-HP-N54L---DSM-6.1-onwards 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toetje583 Posted July 4, 2017 Share #3292 Posted July 4, 2017 7 hours ago, nfarias said: Check http://xpenology.com/forum/index.php?/topic/7527-HP-N54L---DSM-6.1-onwards Many thanks it seems that v1.02a2 works for my system, It's running already! I got a memory problem but I already found leads to fix that! Many thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dman4u1 Posted July 4, 2017 Share #3293 Posted July 4, 2017 On 7/1/2017 at 5:54 AM, cmpugay said: For past few days, I'm trying to upgrade existing Synology install to v. 6.1.15132 but after completing 56%, it throws an error : Failed to install the file. The file is probably corrupt. After this I'm not able to access my data. As I had a backup, hence I removed all the HDDs from my Custom System and formatted it to remove any trace of Synology. Then I replaced them back into my existing Synology system. Now first time it displayed the SETUP and I started from Fresh but after completing approx. 56% it threw error as shown in attached screenshot. After than I attempted to install again but now it is showing MIGRATE and even Migration option is throwing same error after completing 56%. Please help... else I have to look for some other solution. Document1.pdf did you find answer i too have this problem Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Error404 Posted July 5, 2017 Share #3294 Posted July 5, 2017 (edited) 8 hours ago, hpk said: Can you give some technical informations about your installation? Baremetal or VM? What processor, memory? How did you update to 1.02b? It's difficult to help, if there are so few infos. I'm sorry, I thought the information was displayed in my signature. v1.02b , Baremetal - DSM_DS3617xs_15047, HP ProLiant MicroServer Gen8 Xeon(R) CPU E3-1220 V2/8Gb/2*1TB(RAID0)+2x4Tb(RAID1), USB loader, iLO 2.50 I used @Polanskiman's tutorial. Edited July 5, 2017 by Error404 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmpugay Posted July 5, 2017 Share #3295 Posted July 5, 2017 5 hours ago, dman4u1 said: did you find answer i too have this problem Finally I was able to do the task. 1. I used 1.02.a loader with older DSM 2. Then I upgraded to latest DSM. Now it is working fine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hpk Posted July 5, 2017 Share #3296 Posted July 5, 2017 13 hours ago, Error404 said: Hi everyone! DSM on my gen8 was updated to 1.02b (DS3617xs). After a day I was not able to load any web page - "Sorry, the page you are looking for is not found." I had reinstalled DSM and everything were working as before. Today I have received the same message again. Do I understand you right? After a day or so, you're not able to connect to the DS3617xs via webinterface? Sounds like we have the timebomb again ... I got my HPE MicroServer with Xeon Processor yesterday and did two tests based on 1.02b and 3617xs: - Running a baremetal installation of XPEnology ... no issues at all, took me less than 10 minutes - Installing ESXi 6.5 and setup a virtual DS3617xs. Took me two hours or so, as I did some silly mistakes Unfortunately, I did not run the baremetall installation for a long time, so I can't confirm, if there is an issue in general as you see it. The VM is running since yesterday, backups running all night, filling up the disk nicely ... When I'm finished with the installation (a Linux and a Windows VM), I will take out the ESXi disks and run the baremetal one for a few days to see, if I can reproduce your error. But that will be next week ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Error404 Posted July 5, 2017 Share #3297 Posted July 5, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, hpk said: Do I understand you right? After a day or so, you're not able to connect to the DS3617xs via webinterface? Sounds like we have the timebomb again ... Yes, that's right, you understand me correctly. Mobile applications were unavailable too. SMB, Plex and others were working. I have reinstalled DSM again and it's working about 5 hours. Edited July 5, 2017 by Error404 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lunzet Posted July 5, 2017 Share #3298 Posted July 5, 2017 (edited) Just want to share my experience with this awesome project I am running the latest Bootloader 1.02b on ESXI 6.0 without issues or any timebomb problem: Had some issues initially after NIC Teaming (network not responding) and had some bad troubles to get the synoboot.img back to work (Serial + MAC) and DSM to respond to the Network again but after resetting serials and MAC's averything went fine again. In fact running this on VMWare is a very nice setup as you are still able to run other machines in parallel and backup/restore of the DSM VM should give some additional safety nets also. Just wondering if there is any helpful Information available on 1) how the bootloader really works in detail e.g. sequence of loading (this might give evberyone better ideas on where to start troubleshooting). 2) How to attach to the serial port on the VM? Does anyone know? 3) How to map the virtual disk (vmdk) of the VM's system drive (tried some findings from google but the image is not recognized by osfmount for example) to adjust DSM settings in case of emergencies. 4) Is there an up-to-date wiki somewhere? In Summary....highly appreciate all the work from devs and others on this project. Please keep up as this is really an essential good piece of work. Is there any way to give you some donations? (sorry did not search here ) Thanks Edited July 5, 2017 by lunzet jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lunzet Posted July 5, 2017 Share #3299 Posted July 5, 2017 Has anyone running dsm on vmware smart drive information within DSM? Just wondering.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
romracer Posted July 5, 2017 Share #3300 Posted July 5, 2017 (edited) 6 hours ago, Error404 said: Yes, that's right, you understand me correctly. Mobile applications were unavailable too. SMB, Plex and others were working. I have reinstalled DSM again and it's working about 5 hours. This also happened to me somewhere between July 1st and July 2nd. I run 6.1.2 with 1.02b loader in ESXi 6.5 with just virtual disks (no physical pass through). I also happen to have two of these VMs setup and configured with Synology HA. NFS and MariaDB both were still working fine. I was able to reboot the active node and the passive node took over just fine. Its web interface also worked, even though I upgraded both of them on the same day. I hope this info helps. Does that means perhaps the timebomb does not run on the passive node? I reinstalled the node which was not working and rebound it to my HA cluster. Once resync was complete, I made that node the active one again. This was on July 2nd. The problem has not reappeared, yet. What should I look for related to a timebomb the next time it happens? I did not have SSH enabled and my serial console was not working (I think I broke this earlier though because it wasn't working before this) so I had limited visibility into the DSM operating system at the time. I have since enabled SSH and firewalled it appropriately and fixed the serial console, so I should be able to get in and do more investigation if it happens again. Edit: Both of my VMs are emulating DS3617xs. Edited July 5, 2017 by romracer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.