Jump to content
XPEnology Community

[SOLVED] HP Proliant N40L MicroServer native support


jnus

Recommended Posts

I found eject USB script on synology forum

 

http://forum.synology.com/enu/viewtopic ... 39&t=35668

sync; /usr/syno/bin/synousbdisk -umount sdq; >/tmp/usbtab

 

Where it can be placed ? For auto-start after full boot.

 

 

p.s. right answer is:

 

1. create new script S99ZZZ_USB_eject.sh

with

sync; /usr/syno/bin/synousbdisk -umount sdk1; >/tmp/usbtab

2. copy it in the /usr/syno/etc/rc.d directory

3. give it the execute permission via ssh

chmod +x S99ZZZ_USB_eject.sh

4. reboot

 

 

I tried to run this script on N54L and it seems to work properly from the SSH shell, the volume is unmounted properly. But logging in into the admin webpage I get a warning that the USB disk has been removed improperly. Is there any problem?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found eject USB script on synology forum

 

http://forum.synology.com/enu/viewtopic ... 39&t=35668

sync; /usr/syno/bin/synousbdisk -umount sdq; >/tmp/usbtab

 

Where it can be placed ? For auto-start after full boot.

 

 

p.s. right answer is:

 

1. create new script S99ZZZ_USB_eject.sh

with

sync; /usr/syno/bin/synousbdisk -umount sdk1; >/tmp/usbtab

2. copy it in the /usr/syno/etc/rc.d directory

3. give it the execute permission via ssh

chmod +x S99ZZZ_USB_eject.sh

4. reboot

 

 

I tried to run this script on N54L and it seems to work properly from the SSH shell, the volume is unmounted properly. But logging in into the admin webpage I get this warning:

"External device USB Disk on Synology was not ejected properly."

Is it correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Is eSATA port multiplier working on N40L with DSM 5.2?

 

All already have 5 drives in the device, but running low on storage with them and need extra space. I plan to use an 4 oder 5 disk external drive enclosure. Any suggestions?

 

I have N54L and tried (N40L/N54L only cpu difference), eSATA works, but if you are going to use multiple disk enclosure w/SATA multiplier then you will not get what you want. I have an Orico 3-bay eSATA enclosure, if I do not enable RAID mode then DSM will only recognize the 1st disk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
  • 4 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...

@darkknigt : no special recommandation but just to let you know, before I upgrade to version 6 my servers were already registered to Synology's Quickconnect service. So I had a valid MAC and S/N generated with the excel spreadsheet. Then when I upgraded to version 6, I just had to replace the PID and VID and everything went ok.

 

@ oswaldini : i have 2 N40L with 6 HDDs inside with one HDD using eSATA. No issue detected. Everything's OK ! :cool:

 

and I just did the "6.0.2-8451 update 8" update with no problem. :cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@darkknigt : no special recommandation but just to let you know, before I upgrade to version 6 my servers were already registered to Synology's Quickconnect service. So I had a valid MAC and S/N generated with the excel spreadsheet. Then when I upgraded to version 6, I just had to replace the PID and VID and everything went ok.

 

@ oswaldini : i have 2 N40L with 6 HDDs inside with one HDD using eSATA. No issue detected. Everything's OK ! :cool:

 

and I just did the "6.0.2-8451 update 8" update with no problem. :cool:

 

 

does your quick connect work on v6? i have the N40L and juns loader but when i click the quick connect page it just gives me an error?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quick connect has nothing to do with the version of the loader.

You just must use the right combination of Mac and serial.

 

This has been discussed many times...

 

been there done that still gives me "the the system has failed to perform the requested operation, there is an unkown error" as soon as i click onto the "log in to or register a synology account" bit on the quick connect page within the DSM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 2 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...
4 minutes ago, ordimans said:

Good idea !!

Just don't know if i must reuse the menuentry for AMD which was comment.
It use bzImage and no zImage.
ANd not sure if it's ok, because it seems to there is a crc checksum in a file...

Menu entry needs to be fixed. Probably the script too.

Indeed, forgot about the checksum. Yes checksum need to be correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...