Prinz_Protato 0 Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 (edited) Drives showing like this on 6.2.3-25426 update 3 (DS3617xs) This is running Jun's loader 1.03b on EXSI v6.7 update 2 - loading as EXSI (not bare metal) This has FixSynoboot installed and loaded correctly The reason i'm concerned as the Volume 1 is ignoring one of my 3TB HDD's in raid 5, so it's degraded Edited April 3 by Prinz_Protato Quote Link to post Share on other sites
IG-88 831 Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 looks like as if the 1st sata controller you are using for the loader has 32 ports instead of just on i'm not sure about esxi but in virtualbox the number of ports con be configured Quote Link to post Share on other sites
flyride 621 Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 This also happens when a SAS or SCSI virtual controller is used, best to use virtual SATA and they will be numbered correctly. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Prinz_Protato 0 Posted April 4 Author Share Posted April 4 (edited) 11 hours ago, flyride said: This also happens when a SAS or SCSI virtual controller is used, best to use virtual SATA and they will be numbered correctly. Ah. okay - the drives are connected using a hardware LSI raid card in I.T mode (acting as a HBA) Either way - it is all working, and is being backed up to a real synology in case of an issue Edited April 4 by Prinz_Protato Quote Link to post Share on other sites
flyride 621 Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 https://xpenology.com/forum/topic/12952-dsm-62-loader/page/4/ It may be useful to do some experimentation with SasIdxMap. You may want to do this with a single test disk instead of your array however. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Prinz_Protato 0 Posted April 6 Author Share Posted April 6 On 4/4/2021 at 7:14 PM, flyride said: https://xpenology.com/forum/topic/12952-dsm-62-loader/page/4/ It may be useful to do some experimentation with SasIdxMap. You may want to do this with a single test disk instead of your array however. Thanks, but that seems a little too complex for a me, lol. I'll leave it as it is, if I was using it seriously, i'd use a real synology Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.