Dialin Posted December 18, 2020 Share #1 Posted December 18, 2020 (edited) Hey, Im trying to install XPEnology on my new Server: ASRock E3C224D2i Mainboard CPU: Xeon E31241v3 16 Gb ECC RAM 2x Intel i210 lan I used Loader 1.40b (918+) with xtra.lzma (v0.13.3) to prepare the stick. It also boots from the loader, LANs get recognised and the assistant comes up. But the loader screen says "Trying to terminate EFI services again" and after manually selecting the DSM_DS918+_25426.pat I get the error, that it couldn't be installed or might be corrupt. "Die Datei konnte nicht installiert werden. Die Datei ist wahrscheinlich beschädigt (13)." VIN/PID is set correctly. SATA mode is AHCI. Did I oversee something? The 1.04b should work with the Haswell generation CPU. Tank you! @IG-88 Edited December 18, 2020 by Dialin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IG-88 Posted December 19, 2020 Share #2 Posted December 19, 2020 10 hours ago, Dialin said: The 1.04b should work with the Haswell generation CPU. you would not fins the system in network if the cpu is to old 10 hours ago, Dialin said: get the error, that it couldn't be installed or might be corrupt. "Die Datei konnte nicht installiert werden. Die Datei ist wahrscheinlich beschädigt (13)." con you copy the lines with the vid/pid here? make sure the disk has no partitons 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dialin Posted December 19, 2020 Author Share #3 Posted December 19, 2020 (edited) 11 hours ago, IG-88 said: con you copy the lines with the vid/pid here? make sure the disk has no partitons set vid=0x0781 set pid=0x5583 The HDD has no partitions and those who has been created after each install attempt have been removed by myself. In the meantime, I tried loader 1.03b with .pat for DS3617xs and the installation just works fine. Is there any reason I should invest more time to investigate how to setup the 918+ DSM? This NAS will be my backup NAS for the one in my signature. But I like the idea of having them run on 1.04b and 918+ simultaneously... Thanks for your reply! Edited December 19, 2020 by Dialin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IG-88 Posted December 19, 2020 Share #4 Posted December 19, 2020 only pro's for 918+ are hardware transcoding and m.2 nvme support nothing you would need for a system storing backups nothing wrong with 3617, things like rsync and backup packages like hyperbackup are available on both 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dialin Posted December 19, 2020 Author Share #5 Posted December 19, 2020 (edited) 918+ is now working fine, tried another USB-port on the mainboard. Thanks! Edited December 19, 2020 by Dialin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.