Recommended Posts

With further investigation, I found instability of my environment is not for NFS, but another hardware problem.

After separating external esxi's RDM disks using port multiplier & internal intel ICH disks to different disk groups makes my env stable.

Now, all NFS's file open problem went away.

 

"WARNING: NFS: ###: Got error 13 from mount call" log still generated every 1 minute, but it doesn't seems matter.

Does this exist in your vmkernel.log ? > all

 

I'll choose 5.2 with SSD cache, NFS datastore without VAAI.

Without VAAI, cloning is slow & can't use thick disk.

But using DSM VM inside single ESXi server, cloning network traffic is local and CPU overhead with VMXNet3 would be a little(?).

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 5 months later...
  • 1 month later...

I have tested all 5.2 versions thoroughly.NFS VAAI is broken in all 5.2 XPEnology releases. There is no issued on real Synology HW. I am now back on 5.1 5055 until someone fixes this. I do not want to use iSCSI as I get better throughput through NFS.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 7 months later...

Recently I migrated my system from DSM5.2 to DSM 6 with NewLoader and checked VAAI feature.

 

It works fine with NFS again.

I can use thick provisioning with NFS and offline cloning is also working.

There's no problem with SSD cache.

 

I'm very happy with DSM6 with NewLoader.

 

p.s.

I didn't try to use btrfs yet for datastore, because I've heard btrfs has very bad performance as Virtual Machine's datastore...

 

ZFS, BTRFS, XFS, EXT4 and LVM with KVM – A Storage Performance Comparison (2015) | Hacker News

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11749010

 

ZFS, BTRFS, XFS, EXT4 and LVM with KVM – a storage performance comparison

http://www.ilsistemista.net/index.php/v ... print=true

 

I'm interested in Snapshot Replication, but it's very hard to convert big datastore & check performance for me

because of the lack of available hardware resources.

 

https://www.synology.com/en-us/knowledg ... ection_mgr

 

If someone tested performance of btrfs, please share the result on the forum :smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.