enzym Posted October 24, 2014 Share #126 Posted October 24, 2014 What is the power consumption (bare metal / ESXI) using the Asrock Q1900? I'm going to build a second 24/7 XPENology server. Currently I'm wondering, wether a Celeron J1900 will save some money comparing against a Celeron Haswell or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddyemmer Posted October 24, 2014 Share #127 Posted October 24, 2014 My device was around 30w under full load with three hard drives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schnapps Posted October 24, 2014 Share #128 Posted October 24, 2014 I'm using nanoboot 5.0.3.2 with DSM 5.0-4493 Update 7 on Hyper-V 2012R2 and everything is working wonderful! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Does Hyper-V support something equivalent to the ESXi Raw Disk Mapping function? Are you able to pass through SMART data through the hypervisor to the DSM OS? SMART is not working for pass through disks Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poechi Posted October 24, 2014 Share #129 Posted October 24, 2014 (edited) - Edited July 10, 2015 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimware Posted October 24, 2014 Share #130 Posted October 24, 2014 Does anyone found any working solution for wol on q1900-itx? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schnapps Posted October 25, 2014 Share #131 Posted October 25, 2014 This is driving me nuts... Going to look to alternatives like FreeNas etc. lol Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schnapps Posted October 25, 2014 Share #132 Posted October 25, 2014 What is the power consumption (bare metal / ESXI) using the Asrock Q1900? I'm going to build a second 24/7 XPENology server. Currently I'm wondering, wether a Celeron J1900 will save some money comparing against a Celeron Haswell or not. The J1900 - Bay Trail Intel chipset can't be (yet) used for VMware ESX-based installations as the setup is crashing. My suggestion is to use a J1900 and go for either Hyper-V or bare metal. You can switch on the way too. Why J1900? Because it has a strong quad-core CPU that can handle and parallelize a lot of tasks. And because it has a TDP of 10W. It's silent, strong and stingy in regards to electrical power. There is a big difference between WD RED disks and other disks when talking about power consumption. Choose RED disks. You can also go for SSD drives as power consumption is near 0 in comparison to a WD RED drive but they're a bit pricey for their size Take in consideration that (in theory), each PCI slot consumes in average between 10 and 15W of power (just with something plugged-in) If you want a 24/7 xpenobox and consume few watts/h don't use PCI slots. My system consumes in full load CPU+Drives 37-38W. That's 2x 3TB WD RED disks and 2x 3TB Seagate disks Cheers Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddyemmer Posted October 25, 2014 Share #133 Posted October 25, 2014 Running bare metal again without issue no explanation found but I'm happy Freenas is not an option hehe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kasteleman Posted October 25, 2014 Share #134 Posted October 25, 2014 What is the power consumption (bare metal / ESXI) using the Asrock Q1900? I'm going to build a second 24/7 XPENology server. Currently I'm wondering, wether a Celeron J1900 will save some money comparing against a Celeron Haswell or not. The J1900 - Bay Trail Intel chipset can't be (yet) used for VMware ESX-based installations as the setup is crashing. My suggestion is to use a J1900 and go for either Hyper-V or bare metal. You can switch on the way too. Why J1900? Because it has a strong quad-core CPU that can handle and parallelize a lot of tasks. And because it has a TDP of 10W. It's silent, strong and stingy in regards to electrical power. There is a big difference between WD RED disks and other disks when talking about power consumption. Choose RED disks. You can also go for SSD drives as power consumption is near 0 in comparison to a WD RED drive but they're a bit pricey for their size Take in consideration that (in theory), each PCI slot consumes in average between 10 and 15W of power (just with something plugged-in) If you want a 24/7 xpenobox and consume few watts/h don't use PCI slots. As info: I use a HP Nic in the pci-e slot and it rises the powerconsumption with 1 Watt. But a tv-card or other will use more! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evolucja Posted October 29, 2014 Share #135 Posted October 29, 2014 Hi there, any idea why i'm getting only ~40MB of file transfer speed? I used to have full 1Gbit/s on old Intel Atom Motherboard.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddyemmer Posted October 29, 2014 Share #136 Posted October 29, 2014 How are you running? Bare metal or hyper-v? What are your specs? What dsm version and what nanoboot version? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evolucja Posted October 30, 2014 Share #137 Posted October 30, 2014 - DSM 5.0u5 - Nanoboot (5.0.3.2) - Q1900-ITX + 2GB RAM - 2x3TB WD GREEN in RAID1 This is a result from ATTO: However when I copy 2GB file using TOTALCMD I get ~47-60MB while uplading, and 60-75 when download (the speed changes during operation). Shouldn't I be able to get the ~100MB of speed when making such a linear copy operation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pixartao Posted November 3, 2014 Share #138 Posted November 3, 2014 Thanks for all the great answers, I still not able to use the hdmi interface connecting it directly to my tv. Could someone explain me how to set up? I'm so happy about my now NAS, everything is working great with Q1900-ITX and xpenology! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evolucja Posted November 3, 2014 Share #139 Posted November 3, 2014 I'm so happy about my now NAS, everything is working great with Q1900-ITX and xpenology! What transfer rates are you getting on SMB protocol? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pixartao Posted November 4, 2014 Share #140 Posted November 4, 2014 I'm so happy about my now NAS, everything is working great with Q1900-ITX and xpenology! What transfer rates are you getting on SMB protocol? I'm going to test it because it looks a bit slower since i upgrade my laptop to win8. Now seems about 45MB/s it looks a bit slow, I have to make some new tests. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddyemmer Posted November 4, 2014 Share #141 Posted November 4, 2014 i have between 90 and 110 mb/s per second from windows 8.1 over gigabit lan, from disk to disk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kasteleman Posted November 4, 2014 Share #142 Posted November 4, 2014 bare metal? Wat disks are you using? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddyemmer Posted November 4, 2014 Share #143 Posted November 4, 2014 yes bare metal, I use wd red disks, two 1tb in raid 1 and one 3tb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schnapps Posted November 4, 2014 Share #144 Posted November 4, 2014 I have a constant 120MB/s transfer on big files@HyperV Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pixartao Posted November 4, 2014 Share #145 Posted November 4, 2014 How are you testing it? My last test was ~80MB/s Writing and ~45MB/s Reading. The strange thing is that should be opposite! Anyway I found a small problem, i tried to set up the jumbo frame to 9k, I got an error from kernel such it's not support! Looking over the mb specify it should be supported! Someone tried it out? I'm waiting some tips about software to test my nas again. I wanna try over linux too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schnapps Posted November 4, 2014 Share #146 Posted November 4, 2014 Jumbos are needed from what I know only on 10G networks and must be activated on both the client and the server Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schnapps Posted November 4, 2014 Share #147 Posted November 4, 2014 Well, I'm moving some vhdx files and that's the speed I have. Constant speed to be frankly it's 115MB/s Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schnapps Posted November 4, 2014 Share #148 Posted November 4, 2014 Host is Hyper-V 2012R2 and client is Windows 10 Technical Preview and mostly probably SMB3 is used Don't forget that the speed of your rig is 100% connected to the RAID matrix used and the drives inside. I have a SHR1 matrix with identical HDDs (well not identical but 3TB drives) and that's a RAID5 which is not the fastest but not the slowest. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XPEH Posted November 4, 2014 Share #149 Posted November 4, 2014 Jumbos are needed from what I know only on 10G networks and must be activated on both the client and the server Switch must support them too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XPEH Posted November 4, 2014 Share #150 Posted November 4, 2014 Jumbos are needed from what I know only on 10G networks and must be activated on both the client and the server Switch must support them too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts