pixartao Posted October 14, 2014 Share #101 Posted October 14, 2014 Hi everyone! I just bought a Q1900-ITX with a 3TB WD Red, I installed everything but I saw that the system doesn't recognize all 4 cores of the cpu, just 2 of them! Is there any fixing or it's just a problem of the DMS which is not properly showed? Are they used anyway or not? Is there any way to check about it specially during the transcoding? Last question, i still not tryied if the hdmi is working, someone tried it out already? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schnapps Posted October 14, 2014 Share #102 Posted October 14, 2014 Hi everyone!I just bought a Q1900-ITX with a 3TB WD Red, I installed everything but I saw that the system doesn't recognize all 4 cores of the cpu, just 2 of them! Is there any fixing or it's just a problem of the DMS which is not properly showed? Are they used anyway or not? Is there any way to check about it specially during the transcoding? Last question, i still not tryied if the hdmi is working, someone tried it out already? all 4 cores are working. what you see in the gui is just a hardcoded information from the original Synology DS3612 product Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedpenguin Posted October 16, 2014 Share #103 Posted October 16, 2014 Hi everyone!I just bought a Q1900-ITX with a 3TB WD Red, I installed everything but I saw that the system doesn't recognize all 4 cores of the cpu, just 2 of them! Is there any fixing or it's just a problem of the DMS which is not properly showed? Are they used anyway or not? Is there any way to check about it specially during the transcoding? Last question, i still not tryied if the hdmi is working, someone tried it out already? Yes I have the same board and everything works perfectly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddyemmer Posted October 18, 2014 Share #104 Posted October 18, 2014 Does anyone recognize failure when copying a file to nas from a windows 8.1 computer? The nas is working perfect on it's own but when you push or download a file it get's unresponsive? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unmesh Posted October 19, 2014 Share #105 Posted October 19, 2014 Hi, Good news, I solved my USB problem by going in the BIOS and put "Enabled" instead of "Automatic" on the USB 3.0 For the rest, everything was already configured like fufik65 suggested +1 DSM couldn't detect any device, now it's working great Worked for me too! Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddyemmer Posted October 21, 2014 Share #106 Posted October 21, 2014 what version are you guys running because i stil have some issues losing network connectivity after pushing data towards my nas. If i connect a usb keyboard i can login and reboot the nas but it is still strange. also data tranfser does not go any faster then 60 mb/s. my config is Nanoboot-5.0.3.2 DSM 5.0-4493 X64 with DSM 5.0-4493 Update 7, on a Q1900-ITX with two wd red 1tb in shr and one 3tb wd red. This problem only occurs on file transfers from and to the nas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schnapps Posted October 21, 2014 Share #107 Posted October 21, 2014 I'm using nanoboot 5.0.3.2 with DSM 5.0-4493 Update 7 on Hyper-V 2012R2 and everything is working wonderful! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddyemmer Posted October 21, 2014 Share #108 Posted October 21, 2014 is there an particulair reason you are not running on bare metal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schnapps Posted October 21, 2014 Share #109 Posted October 21, 2014 I ran on bare metal but then I wanted to have also some more machines running in background. Now I have 7 machines on this small rig Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddyemmer Posted October 21, 2014 Share #110 Posted October 21, 2014 hmmm.. could always try going on vmsphere, my virtual diskstations are working better then the bare metal version, did you use virtual disk or assign them directy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schnapps Posted October 21, 2014 Share #111 Posted October 21, 2014 Pass throughout disks. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unmesh Posted October 21, 2014 Share #112 Posted October 21, 2014 I'm using nanoboot 5.0.3.2 with DSM 5.0-4493 Update 7 on Hyper-V 2012R2 and everything is working wonderful! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Does Hyper-V support something equivalent to the ESXi Raw Disk Mapping function? Are you able to pass through SMART data through the hypervisor to the DSM OS? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddyemmer Posted October 22, 2014 Share #113 Posted October 22, 2014 Esxi is not working on this setup at least not 5.5. Hyper-v is working but shows at my disk station not the correct operation temperature the rest shows up just fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
butcher55 Posted October 22, 2014 Share #114 Posted October 22, 2014 What about disk spin down? Is this possible when running as virtual machine? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddyemmer Posted October 22, 2014 Share #115 Posted October 22, 2014 smart info is not shown, you can use thiswalktrough for it, if disk spindown is working i don't know, it did not on my bare mental version because of the application that i run but if you want all those features why not just buy synology hardware? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
butcher55 Posted October 22, 2014 Share #116 Posted October 22, 2014 btw spin down DOES work on my Q1900 board, I'm just wondering whether it's possible to do that with virtualization. What I would like to achieve is to run XBMC and Xpenology simultaneously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kasteleman Posted October 22, 2014 Share #117 Posted October 22, 2014 Running XBMC and Xpenology simultaneously. Installed Linux on a SSD with XBMC standalone. However Xpenology is running in VMWare Workstation. Disk (sata WD) directly passed through to the virtual machine running Xpenology. Disk was first running on the same hardwarebox with gnoboot usb boot disk. Migration was plug and play. All settings remaind including my data. However have no disk spindown active. Does not work because of the installed programms within Xpenology (syslog, database, webserver etc) Configured the vm to run with 2 cpu's. In XBMC i even connect to the Xpenology share for my content. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatez Posted October 22, 2014 Share #118 Posted October 22, 2014 @kasteleman like my mind-project : xpenology in native mode but xbmc in chroot enviroment (only on my mind) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kasteleman Posted October 22, 2014 Share #119 Posted October 22, 2014 Was also on my mind, but XBMC in chroot environment complained about x-server or something like that. Could not figure out how to do it, so aborted that project. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddyemmer Posted October 23, 2014 Share #120 Posted October 23, 2014 im not sure, i use xbmc on another machine but i have perfomance issues with NFS playback from my hyper-v config. This is driving me nuts, first issues on bare metal, now performance issues on hyper-v. hardware is tested and all ok, im not sure where to look anymore. Going to look to alternatives like FreeNas etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QWERT Posted October 23, 2014 Share #121 Posted October 23, 2014 kasteleman: i like your implementation thx! Would you mind sharing the up and download speeds you get from/to xpenology? @all: i really appreciate this thread&forum, thanks for sharing your findings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kasteleman Posted October 23, 2014 Share #122 Posted October 23, 2014 From a ubuntu to xpenology with rsync: +/- 40 Mb/s. But that's with only one sata disk. So with multiple diskconfiguration it will be higher if the uploading machine can handle it. Have to mention that i'm using a HP nic with intel gigabit chip and disabled the onboard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QWERT Posted October 23, 2014 Share #123 Posted October 23, 2014 thx k! that is interesting i would have hoped for more, do you mind sharing the disk-sizes and types for that transfer? was it like a) SSD --> 4 Tb SATA or more like b) 1 Tb SATA --> 2 Tb SATA, just to get a feeling as i would think that a) should give more speed than b) Any particular reason for not using the onboard chip,e.g. is the onboard weak? or you wanted a proper nic.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kasteleman Posted October 23, 2014 Share #124 Posted October 23, 2014 1.5 Tb -> 1.5TB, but mix of iso's with size up to 12Gb and small files (foto's) etc. Disk's are 3 years old and sata 300. I've switched to the intel because of intermitted drops of networkspeed. Did not measure download speed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QWERT Posted October 23, 2014 Share #125 Posted October 23, 2014 excellent that helps! not sure when i will do my build, but i will post hopefully ssd-->5 or 6 Tb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts