Benchmarking your synology


Recommended Posts

Loader: jun 1.03b (DS3615xs)

DSM: DSM 6.2.2-24922 Update 4

Hardware/CPU: J3455B-ITX

HDD: 2x Samsung HD154UI in Raid 0

 

CPU:

dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=1024 | md5sum

1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.75623 s, 390 MB/s

 

Disk:

sudo dd bs=1M count=8192 if=/dev/zero of=/volume2/franken0/testx conv=fdatasync

8589934592 bytes (8.6 GB) copied, 44.149 s, 195 MB/s

Link to post
Share on other sites

ASROCK Q1900M + 8GB Ram + 2 HDD
DSM 6.2.3-25423
Loader : JUN'S LOADER v1.04b - DS918++ extra.lzma @IG-88 custom V 0.10
 

 root@Xxxxx:~# grep MHz /proc/cpuinfo
 cpu MHz         : 1993.000
 cpu MHz         : 1993.000
 cpu MHz         : 1993.000
 cpu MHz         : 1993.000
 
 root@Xxxxx:~# dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=1024 | md5sum
 1024+0 records in
 1024+0 records out
 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 3.27983 s, 327 MB/s
 
 root@Xxxxx:~# time $(i=0; while (( i 
 real    2m15.450s
 user    2m15.660s
 sys     0m0.000s
 
Edited by neo82ita
Link to post
Share on other sites

Loader: jun 1.04b (DS918+)

DSM: DSM 6.2.3-25423 with Driver extension 0.11 for HW transcoding.

Hardware/CPU: Gugabyte B365M DS3H / Gold G5400

HDD: 1x Seagate ST2000DM008-2FR102  Brtfs

          2x WD WD20EFRX-68EUZN0 Raid 1

          2x SSD Kingston A400 Cache Raid 1 for Seagate Volume

          2x SSD ADATA SX6000LNP  - Cache Raid 1 for WD Raid 1

 

CPU:

root@DiskStation:/volume2/public# time $(i=0; while (( i < 9999999 )); do (( i ++ )); done)

real    0m25.304s
user    0m25.301s
sys     0m0.001s
root@DiskStation:/volume2/public# dd bs=1M count=1k if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null | md5sum
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e  -
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 0.0485021 s, 22.1 GB/s
 

Disk:

root@DiskStation:/volume2/public# sudo dd bs=1M count=256 if=/dev/zero of=/volume2/public/testx conv=fdatasync
256+0 records in
256+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 1.62424 s, 165 MB/s
root@DiskStation:/volume2/public# sudo dd bs=1M count=256 if=/dev/zero of=/volume3/data/testx conv=fdatasync
256+0 records in
256+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 2.55855 s, 105 MB/s

 

Very disappointed in Disk Speed.

 

[  273.370385] pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: AER: Corrected error received: id=00e8

[  273.370402] pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected, type=Physical Layer, id=00e8(Receiver ID)

[  273.380798] pcieport 0000:00:1d.0:   device [8086:a298] error status/mask=00000001/00002000

[  273.389296] pcieport 0000:00:1d.0:    [ 0] Receiver Error

Error remaing after update.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 8 months later...

Tests for new energy saving (maybe 24/7) laptop xpenology system (for download/vm/torrent).

Everything is running really smooth on that system, VMs (phpVirtualBox) are working like a charm, thanks to 16 GB RAM (tested Windows 7/Ubuntu/Windows XP, more will follow). With 2-3 VMs running it's @ around 18-30W (depending on workload, never seen more than 30W). Edit: just seen 35W :) But normally idleing < 20W with 2 VMs. Got a USB-cooler (2 fans for the bottom), that keeps everything in good temps so far,  that's why i think 24/7 should be possible.

 

I'm quite new to the XPenology community, but I learned a lot the last weeks and I also built a HP N54l (will only be used for backups), which is running great too. But I need to make decisions there, which HDDs to choose...

 

Loader: jun 1.04 (DS918+)

DSM: 6.2.3-25426 Update 3

CPU: Intel i5 5300U (Dell E7450)

SSD: M.2 TS512GMTS600 (in a M.2 to SATA case) - thinking about to use the M.2 WWAN slot for another SSD and put a normal HDD in instead the actual used SSD. so many 2,5" HDDs flying around here...:)

 

CPU:

dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=1024 | md5sum
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.19316 s, 490 MB/s
cd573cfaace07e7949bc0c46028904ff  -

 

Disk:

sudo dd bs=1M count=256 if=/dev/zero of=/volume1/share/testx conv=fdatasync
256+0 records in
256+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 0.719769 s, 373 MB/s
 

Edited by Helios123
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...
On 1/14/2021 at 12:30 AM, Helios123 said:

Tests for new energy saving (maybe 24/7) laptop xpenology system (for download/vm/torrent).

Everything is running really smooth on that system, VMs (phpVirtualBox) are working like a charm, thanks to 16 GB RAM (tested Windows 7/Ubuntu/Windows XP, more will follow). With 2-3 VMs running it's @ around 18-30W (depending on workload, never seen more than 30W). Edit: just seen 35W :) But normally idleing < 20W with 2 VMs. Got a USB-cooler (2 fans for the bottom), that keeps everything in good temps so far,  that's why i think 24/7 should be possible.

 

I'm quite new to the XPenology community, but I learned a lot the last weeks and I also built a HP N54l (will only be used for backups), which is running great too. But I need to make decisions there, which HDDs to choose...

 

Loader: jun 1.04 (DS918+)

DSM: 6.2.3-25426 Update 3

CPU: Intel i5 5300U (Dell E7450)

SSD: M.2 TS512GMTS600 (in a M.2 to SATA case) - thinking about to use the M.2 WWAN slot for another SSD and put a normal HDD in instead the actual used SSD. so many 2,5" HDDs flying around here...:)

 

CPU:

dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=1024 | md5sum
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.19316 s, 490 MB/s
cd573cfaace07e7949bc0c46028904ff  -

 

Disk:

sudo dd bs=1M count=256 if=/dev/zero of=/volume1/share/testx conv=fdatasync
256+0 records in
256+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 0.719769 s, 373 MB/s
 

 

changed my "laptop nas" to a hp 840 g1, which is running at 10-11W in idle and a few w more with 1 running xubuntu docker vm.

identical cpu speed (i5-4200U), will add another ssd for a raid 1 and a 2,5gbe usb adapter

 

full load ~ 25W.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

thinking about to use the M.2 WWAN slot for another SSD

Pretty sure (any time I've looked into it anyway) that that's not going to work - as the WWAN slot is M.2 Key E; and they just don't work for any sort of disk.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...

Loader: Jun 1.0.3b (DS3617xs)

DSM: DSM 6.2.3-25426 Update 3

CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v3 @ 2.40GHz

RAM: 64GB DDR4

Volume 1: 4x 1TB SATA SSDs in RAIDF1

Volume 2: 8x 10TB 7200RPM SAS HDD SHR-1

 

root@nas:/# dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=1024 | md5sum

1024+0 records in

1024+0 records out

1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.05894 s, 522 MB/s

root@nas:/volume1# dd bs=1M count=256 if=/dev/zero of=/volume1/testx conv=fdatasync

256+0 records in

256+0 records out

268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 0.398221 s, 674 MB/s

root@nas:/volume1# dd bs=1M count=256 if=/dev/zero of=/volume2/testx conv=fdatasync

256+0 records in

256+0 records out

268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 1.51573 s, 177 MB/s

 

Edited by linkinparkfan007
Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, linkinparkfan007 said:

root@nas:/volume1# dd bs=1M count=256 if=/dev/zero of=/volume2/testx conv=fdatasync

256+0 records in

256+0 records out

268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 1.51573 s, 177 MB/s

 

why just 268MB?

i see much higher speeds irl and when changing to bigger numbers like

bs=10M count=4096

i see write speeds around 600MB/s for a 12 x 4TB raid6

Link to post
Share on other sites

MainNAS

 

4x WD RED HDDs in RAID 10

sudo dd if=/dev/zero of=/volume1/homes/lan/testx bs=4096M count=1 conv=fdatasync oflag=direct
0+1 records in
0+1 records out
2147479552 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 14.1281 s, 152 MB/s

 

4x SanDisk Ultra 3D SSDs in RAID 0

sudo dd if=/dev/zero of=/volume2/cache/testx bs=4096M count=1 conv=fdatasync oflag=direct
0+1 records in
0+1 records out
2147479552 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 1.99687 s, 1.1 GB/s

 

Edited by smileyworld
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.