Jump to content
XPEnology Community

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'combine'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Information
    • Readers News & Rumours
    • Information and Feedback
    • The Noob Lounge
  • XPEnology Project
    • F.A.Q - START HERE
    • Loader Releases & Extras
    • DSM Updates Reporting
    • Developer Discussion Room
    • Tutorials and Guides
    • DSM Installation
    • DSM Post-Installation
    • Packages & DSM Features
    • General Questions
    • Hardware Modding
    • Software Modding
    • Miscellaneous
  • International
    • РУССКИЙ
    • FRANÇAIS
    • GERMAN
    • SPANISH
    • ITALIAN
    • KOREAN

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


About Me

Found 1 result

  1. Because of the 24/26 disks hardlimit of syno/xpenology, I was trying to figure out if there is a way of combining multiple Xpenology rigs to create a combined volume. Example: DS3617 1TB /volume1/FolderA/SubFolderA,B,C DS3615 2TB/volume1/FolderA/SubFolderC,D,E 3TB /volume1/FolderB/SubFolderX,Y,Z Result: DS36157 3TB /volume1/FolderA/SubFolderA,B,C,D,E 3TB /volume1/FolderB/SubFolderX,Y,Z Is there a way? Currently reading up on GlusterFS and LizardFS and seems like the right idea/the future. Is there a way to do this? Clients will only see shares from DS36157. I read up on High Availability, and seems like that's more on having a redundant/failover Xpenology system. Also, how would I design the whole system? 2 Xpe box and 1 Xpe "master" or something? Cheers and thanks!
×
×
  • Create New...