Ah ok, maybe in that case I'll consider leaving it alone then, its more of a cosmetic thing really.
Regarding hiding the 50MB drive, after some extensive testing, I noticed that if you hide the 50MB drive by moving the SATA port in the VM settings to a higher number before installing DSM fresh, the installation fails with I think a code 13 stating that the file is probably corrupt. However, if it is set to a lower port number, the initial installation goes through smoothly no problems. This got me thinking perhaps during future security updates, if the 50MB drive is set back to a higher port number in the VM settings to where it is hidden, could subsequent DSM updates/security patches fail installing? Meaning I'd have to "reveal" the 50MB drive before an update then hide it again?