[DSM 6.2.2-24922 Update 2]

- Outcome of the update: SUCCESSFUL
- DSM version prior update: DSM 6.2.2-24922
- Loader version and model: Jun's Loader v1.04b - DS918+
- Using custom extra.lzma: NO
- Installation type: BAREMETAL - ASRock H370M-ITX/AC

- Additional Comment: Reboot required

[Updating from 6.2.1 update 4 to update 6]

@Hardly AnonymousBaremetal, intel i3 8100, intel network cards, updated from version 4 to 6.

[Updating from 6.2.1 update 4 to update 6]

I'm running the 918+ launcher.  Updated without problems just from the GUI

[Looking to upgrade from Gen8]

I also really love Xpenology but a friend of mine uses Unraid and he loves that (and I do admit it looks quite decent too)  I've used openmediavault in the past and quite liked that Nas OS too.  I don't think they look as polished as Synology though.

[Upgraded to 6.2.1 - Services now shutting down after WEBUI login]

I'm using Baremetal and ended up just reinstalling DSM on a blank disk and letting DSM reinstall.  Strange behaviour.  Haven't had that happen since I use Xpenology since v 5.

[Upgraded to 6.2.1 - Services now shutting down after WEBUI login]

I have the exact same behaviour.  Have you figured out how to solve it?

[Accessing GUI crashes system]

Hey,  I upgraded from ds3615xs with loader 1.02b DSM version 6.1.7 to ds3615xs with loader 1.03b DSM version 6.2-23739.  Everything works untill I access the diskstation GUI, then the whole system crashes and I can't access the Samba drives, Synology Drive and the IP disappears altogether.  Without accessing the GUI system is stable.  Anyone has a clue what's going on?

 

[NoIP DDNS service]

Your problem is probably related to NAT loopback rather than a DNS problem.  See if your router supports NAT loopback and if so, enable it and see if that works.  If your router doesn't support UPnP I doubt it would support NAT Loopback though.  We used to alter host files in a windows environment to have the IP of the system correspond with the DDNS.  I don't know if that's possible with xpenology.

[What hardware are you using?]

I could do that but I guess I will never hit the 5 nor 6 Gbps theoretical transfer speed with the WD Red disks I put in there.

[What hardware are you using?]

My build is an Intel Nuc D54250WYKH2 with a Fantec 4 bay enclosure that supports e-Sata and USB 3.0. Although theoretically 1 Gbps slower I chose USB 3.0 over SATA because I need to leave the NUC open to connect SATA whereas I can just connect USB on the back. I really like this setup. It's rather fast, silent, power efficient and compact.