Jump to content
XPEnology Community

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/22/2018 in all areas

  1. Hi, everyone, Thanks for you patience. A new ds918 loader support 6.2/6.21 is uploaded. whats new: uefi issue fixed. i915 driver updated. link https://mega.nz/#F!Fgk01YoT!7fN9Uxe4lpzZWPLXPMONMA (for DS918+) - v1.04b ---Beginning of addition by polanskiman--- link https://mega.nz/#!OV4gVKyZ!dCgfXx1bgAOyvbFwFiov3s7RSNoFuqnAcNmSllLoUiw (for DS3615xs) - v1.03b link https://mega.nz/#!zcogjaDT!qIEazI49daggE2odvSwazn3VqBc_wv0zAvab6m6kHbA (for DS3617xs) - v1.03b Please read this topic to know what loader to chose: ---End of addition by polanskiman---
    5 points
  2. Yep, je mets à jour mon commentaire. Et voilà le template publier
    1 point
  3. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Intel_graphics_(Русский) Ядро сбоит с ядрами 4.0+ на чипах Broadwell/Core-M Через несколько секунд после запуска X/Wayland машина зависает и в логе journalctl будет описан крах ядра ссылающийся на графику Intel, как показано ниже: Jun 16 17:54:03 hostname kernel: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null) Jun 16 17:54:03 hostname kernel: IP: [< (null)>] (null) ... Jun 16 17:54:03 hostname kernel: CPU: 0 PID: 733 Comm: gnome-shell Tainted: G U O 4.0.5-1-ARCH #1 ... Jun 16 17:54:03 hostname kernel: Call Trace: Jun 16 17:54:03 hostname kernel: [<ffffffffa055cc27>] ? i915_gem_object_sync+0xe7/0x190 [i915] Jun 16 17:54:03 hostname kernel: [<ffffffffa0579634>] intel_execlists_submission+0x294/0x4c0 [i915] Jun 16 17:54:03 hostname kernel: [<ffffffffa05539fc>] i915_gem_do_execbuffer.isra.12+0xabc/0x1230 [i915] Jun 16 17:54:03 hostname kernel: [<ffffffffa055d349>] ? i915_gem_object_set_to_cpu_domain+0xa9/0x1f0 [i915] Jun 16 17:54:03 hostname kernel: [<ffffffff811ba2ae>] ? __kmalloc+0x2e/0x2a0 Jun 16 17:54:03 hostname kernel: [<ffffffffa0555471>] i915_gem_execbuffer2+0x141/0x2b0 [i915] Jun 16 17:54:03 hostname kernel: [<ffffffffa042fcab>] drm_ioctl+0x1db/0x640 [drm] Jun 16 17:54:03 hostname kernel: [<ffffffffa0555330>] ? i915_gem_execbuffer+0x450/0x450 [i915] Jun 16 17:54:03 hostname kernel: [<ffffffff8122339b>] ? eventfd_ctx_read+0x16b/0x200 Jun 16 17:54:03 hostname kernel: [<ffffffff811ebc36>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x2c6/0x4d0 Jun 16 17:54:03 hostname kernel: [<ffffffff811f6452>] ? __fget+0x72/0xb0 Jun 16 17:54:03 hostname kernel: [<ffffffff811ebec1>] SyS_ioctl+0x81/0xa0 Jun 16 17:54:03 hostname kernel: [<ffffffff8157a589>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17 Jun 16 17:54:03 hostname kernel: Code: Bad RIP value. Jun 16 17:54:03 hostname kernel: RIP [< (null)>] (null) Это может быть исправлено путем отключения поддержки execlist, которая была изменена по умолчанию на ядре с версии 4.0. Добавьте следующий параметр ядра: i915.enable_execlists=0 Эта поломка с ядрами версии меньше 4.0.5.
    1 point
  4. смотрите на предыдущих страницах, там ссылка есть. https://mega.nz/#F!Fgk01YoT!7fN9Uxe4lpzZWPLXPMONMA
    1 point
  5. I am locking down this thread as it is redundant with the main loader thread. Please look here and ask your questions there: I have also moved all posts made by members here after Jun released v1.04b to the loader thread so please take it from there.
    1 point
  6. A general question to the folks here, why are you using XPEnology over similar solutions? I'll talk about my own use case first, I have a moderately beefy CPU (i3-6100T) on an Intel C236 chipset, 8GB of ECC RAM and 5 6TB drives. I'd like to turn that into a reliable (preferably using as modern, copy-on-write filesystem) file server - right now I'm less interested in media streaming or VMs. Why not just get a Synology? Good question. I already spent all this money on my hardware, and I don't think Synology's boxes are particularly powerful from a hardware point of view... FreeNAS? That was my original plan. But ZFS, while an awesome filesystem in an enterprise scenario, just isn't flexible enough for home users (I'm sure you all know that you can't just add drives to a ZFS array). OpenMediaVault? This was the second NAS OS I tested. It is (as the name suggests) open, well organized, and very flexible. It runs on top of regular Debian so it's easy to drop into a Linux shell and run commands from there. Unfortunately, I found I needed to do that a lot more than anticipated. OMV was a little too "fiddly" for me... OMV has a good ZFS plugin, but BTRFS isn't as well supported. It does offer SnapRAID though, which you can think of as non-realtime parity. unRAID is what I checked out next (and decided to buy). I was blown away by its slickness and user friendliness. Everything just....works. Enterprise sysadmins might turn up their noses at it, but it provides most of what I need - up to two parity drives give plenty of redundancy. What's more, if the worst comes to the worst, I can still take out any functioning drives and read them individually. unRAID doesn't have built-in bitrot protection unfortunately, although you can use either a file integrity plugin or a BTRFS scrub to at least be warned about checksum mismatches. Rockstor is a BTRFS-only NAS OS. Looks good on paper, but development seems to have pretty much stopped, and the constant upsell attempts are annoying too. So, finally - why XPEnology? I am obviously concerned about the long-term viability of such a "hacky" environment. But DSM is just so simple and powerful. 😍 I love that I can make automated, cyclical BTRFS snapshots of my files... I don't think any other comparable system offers this! So, that's me. Would love to hear your viewpoints on what I may have missed, and on why YOU are using XPEnology (and what for). Cheers!
    1 point
  7. What you just wrote is pretty much my viewpoints in a nutshell. Odd that there was a very similar exchange yesterday.
    1 point
  8. 1 point
  9. You guys should look over your bios settings, I have a j3455M with two extra ahci cards, two ports per a card(using 5 of the 6 ports) and I do not have of these issues. Bios (1.80 spectre/meltdown) CPU config: Intel SpeedStep = disabled - No driver (Slows and crashes system) CPU C States = disabled intel vt-d = enabled PowerGear = Sport (Buttery smooth Plex) Chipset Configuration: Adjust your memory speed and voltage, don't leave it on auto. Share Memory = 64 Onboard HD Audio = Disabled ACPI Configuration: Suspend to RAM = disabled RTC Alarm Power On = disabled (DSM can't read RTC Clock so doubt this would work, best to disable for now) USB Configuration: Legacy USB Support = UEFI only Trusted Computing: Disable all Security Screen: Secure Boot = Disabled Intel(R) Platform Trust Technology = Disabled Boot Screen: CSM (Compatibility Support Module) = Disabled Some additional notes. Goto /etc.defaults/synoinfo.conf support_led_brightness_adjustment="no" that should fix your ahci_led stuff support_fan="no" support_spectre_meltdown_mitigation="yes" (Check bottom) if your on bios 1.80(j3455m) or which ever version that fixes the spectre/meldown for the j3455*-itx model Plex does hw transcoding every time I use it, never had to reboot it, do you guys have plex pass?
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...